Why Your Knowledge of Relationships is Mostly Wrong & The Art of Saying No - SYSK Choice

Primary Topic

This episode dives into misconceptions about relationships and offers techniques for effectively saying "no."

Episode Summary

In the podcast episode "Why Your Knowledge of Relationships is Mostly Wrong & The Art of Saying No - SYSK Choice," host Mike Carruthers interviews Eric Barker, author of "Plays Well with Others," which challenges common beliefs about relationships and decision-making. The discussion highlights our poor understanding of loved ones' thoughts and the societal changes that have intensified feelings of loneliness. The episode also covers strategies for saying "no," emphasizing the importance of maintaining personal boundaries to manage stress and fulfill personal goals. Insights from experts like John Gottman on marriage and Michael Tougias on assertiveness provide listeners with practical advice for improving personal and professional relationships.

Main Takeaways

  1. Understanding loved ones' thoughts is commonly overestimated, with accuracy as low as 35%.
  2. The concept of loneliness has evolved due to increased individualism and reduced community involvement.
  3. Effective communication and maintaining boundaries are crucial for healthy relationships.
  4. Saying "no" can liberate individuals from unwanted commitments, enhancing personal well-being.
  5. Strategies for lie detection and understanding others through non-verbal cues are discussed, revealing common misconceptions and effective techniques.

Episode Chapters

1: Understanding Misconceptions

Covers the common misunderstandings about relationships and personal perceptions. Mike Carruthers: "When it comes to meeting strangers, we only predict our thoughts and feelings accurately 20% of the time."

2: The Art of Saying No

Discusses the importance of saying "no" to manage one's life and stress effectively. Michael Tougias: "No will set you free from other people's agendas."

3: Practical Relationship Advice

Focuses on actionable relationship insights from experts. John Gottman: "69% of ongoing issues that couples have never get resolved."

Actionable Advice

  1. Assess personal boundaries to manage stress and commitments effectively.
  2. Engage in meaningful communication to enhance relationship quality.
  3. Utilize assertive communication to refuse undesired requests without guilt.
  4. Prioritize personal well-being and important relationships.
  5. Practice empathy to improve understanding of others' perspectives.

About This Episode

Why is it you see people on the news every once in a while who claim to drink and smoke and eat a questionable diet – and still live to be 100 while healthy people sometimes die young? This episode begins by exploring this phenomenon and reveals what your odds of living to 100 on the whiskey and cigarette diet really are. Source: Dr. Robert Butler author of The Longevity Prescription (https://amzn.to/392khSV)

You have likely heard of these sayings:

• Love conquers all

• No man is an island

• A friend in need is a friend indeed

• You can’t judge a book by its cover

These sayings all have to do with relationships (or lack of) with other people. But are they true? Eric Barker has taken a hard look into the research on love and friendship and he joins me with some startling findings. Eric is author of the book Plays Well with Others: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Relationships is (Mostly) Wrong (https://amzn.to/3vQdZi9)

While it is sometimes hard to say no to someone, how many times have you said yes and regretted it? If you could use some help on getting good at saying no and not feel so guilty about it, listen to my conversation with bestselling author Michael Tougias, author of the book No Will Set You Free. (https://amzn.to/3sm5HfF)

Bananas are more interesting than you might think. First of all, you probably believe they come from a tree. They don’t. Also, a bunch of bananas is not technically called a bunch. And there’s more. Listen as I dazzle you with my banana knowledge which can then use to dazzle your friends. https://www.britannica.com/plant/banana-plant

People

Mike Carruthers, Eric Barker, Michael Tougias, John Gottman

Companies

Leave blank if none.

Books

"Plays Well with Others" by Eric Barker

Guest Name(s):

Eric Barker

Content Warnings:

None

Transcript

Bumble Advertisement
Look, Bumble knows youre exhausted by dating. Alda must not take yourself too seriously. And six one since that matters. And what do I even say other than hey? Well thats why theyre introducing an all new bumble with exciting features to make compatibility easier, starting the chat better, and dating safer.

Theyve changed so you dont have to download the new bumble now.

Mike Carruthers
Today on something you should know. Why do some people smoke and drink and then live to 100 while some healthy people die young? Then the surprising science of how well you understand other people. When it comes to meeting strangers, we only predict our thoughts and feelings accurately 20% of the time. With friends that hits 30% and with spouses it only hits 35%.

Eric Barker
So whatever you think is on your spouse's mind two thirds of the time, you're wrong. Also, what you probably never knew about bananas and how to get good at saying no and not saying yes to everyone. Here's a little litmus test. If there's too much yes in your life, are you stressed from being over scheduled? Are you getting enough sleep and me time?

Michael Tougias
And then lastly, is there one important project you've wanted to do for years but never found the time? All this today on something you should know. If you have to hire someone, what's the best way? Referrals? Well, maybe that could work.

Mike Carruthers
But just because somebody knows somebody who knows you doesn't necessarily mean they're qualified. Or you could pull out that file of random resumes that came in during the last six months. Maybe there's somebody in there. Maybe. Now, if you're hiring, you need indeed, indeed is your matching and hiring platform.

With over 350 million global monthly visitors, according to indie data, and a matching engine that helps you find quality candidates fast. As a business owner, I found that hiring the right people, well, there's just nothing more important. Don't leave it to chance, or a referral or a random resume. Use indeed in the minute I've been talking to you, 23 hires were made on indeed according to indeed data worldwide. Indeed's matching engine is constantly learning from your preferences.

So the more you use indeed, the better it gets. And listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@indeed.com. Something. Just go to indeed.com something right now and support this show by saying you heard about indeed on something you should know. Indeed.com something.

Terms and conditions apply. Need to hire? Oh, you need indeed. Something you should know. Fascinating intel, the world's top experts, and practical advice you can use in your life today.

Something you should know with Mike Carruthers. Hi. Welcome to something you should know. Have you ever noticed, usually it's on the news. Every once in a while, you'll see someone who's over 100 years old saying that they drank whiskey and smoked a pack of cigarettes every day for their entire life, and yet they still live to be 100.

So whats the deal? Is it really all just a crapshoot? Well, according to doctor Robert Butler, whos author of a book called the Longevity Prescription, these kind of people are very rare. And if you follow the liquor and cigarette diet, its not a good way to ensure that youll make it to 100. We know that 75% of the factors that determine how long you live are up to you.

That includes where you live, how you eat and exercise, how you manage stress, all those lifestyle things. 25% of the factors have more to do with your genes and chance, good and bad. Some people do everything right but die young. Some people smoke and drink and live to 100. But the odds are if you take care of yourself, youll live a long and healthy life.

And that is something you should know.

We all have relationships in life, and theyre all different. We have friends, lovers, relatives. Some of us have more relationships than others. Some of us are happy with our relationships. Some of us are not.

Human relationships are complicated, necessary, but complicated. Eric Barker has taken a really interesting exploration into how human relationships work. He is the author of a book called plays well with the surprising science behind why everything you know about relationships is mostly wrong. Hi, Eric. Welcome.

Eric Barker
It's great to be here. So, as a way of explanation, you looked at some of the things that we've all heard about relationships, like love conquers all. No man is an island. A friend in need is a friend in need. And you really put these things through a stress test to see if they're true.

Mike Carruthers
So let's start with no man as an island, which refers to loneliness. What did you discover? What was really interesting to me is that before the 19th century, loneliness didn't seem to exist. The word was used, but it didn't have the negative connotation. And this is work by Fay Alberti at the University of York.

Eric Barker
And I was kind of shocked by that. But what she found was that back then, we were all embedded in communities. We were parts of religions, nations, tribes, groups. And so we always felt connected to something. And this ties in with the research where John Cacioppo, who's done a lot of the work on loneliness, found that lonely people actually don't spend any less time with people than non lonely people do, which, again, kind of shocking.

But the issue here is that we've all felt lonely in a crowd. It's not just being proximate to people. It's how you feel about your relationships. Loneliness is a subjective experience of how you feel about your relationships. Do you feel connected to people?

So I was really shocked because much like I'm sure most people, I felt like loneliness was just an issue of having people around you. But it's really more of a gauge of how you feel about how your relationships, how meaningful they are. And the flip side of that is there are people who spend time alone who don't feel lonely. Absolutely. And Vivek Murthy, the surgeon general of the United States, in his book, he talked about how solitude is actually a positive thing.

Loneliness is correlated with nearly every negative health metric you can imagine. But solitude, on the other hand, when we do feel like those connections are there, when we do feel meaningful relationships with other people, spending time alone is correlated with creativity, with insight. It's really powerful. But it's that difference. It's not so much are you proximate to people, it's how are you feeling about your relationships distinguishes loneliness from solitude.

And while loneliness is terrible, solitude is something that's great for us. Well, I find it really interesting, and I hadn't heard it before, you just said it, that until, you know, 100, 200 years ago, loneliness wasn't even a thing. And given what a big thing it is now, it makes you wonder what happened in that period of time that made loneliness such a big problem. Well, it's funny. Basically, the first time, the word lonely was used in plenty of texts, but it just meant isolated.

It didn't have that negative spin to it. And it was actually first in Mary Shelley's book Frankenstein, where we saw loneliness as this bad thing. And that's because the 19th century, we saw this explosion of individualism. You know, as we all collectively became more successful, we were able to be more individualistic. We weren't as reliant on our groups for survival.

And then this even expanded more in the 20th century. Robert Putnam has done work at Harvard showing how it was television that in many ways kind of replaced a lot of our relationships. And in the late 20th century, that led to the decline of bowling leagues and elk lodges and all of these communal activities, they kind of fell to the wayside as television, as what is called a parasocial relationship. That relationship with those characters on tv, in many ways came to replace relationships or at the very least, it cannibalized some of the budget that we all have for social time. And what was it about Frankenstein that introduce the concept of loneliness?

Mike Carruthers
Was it just. The monster was lonely? Yeah. I mean, he feels apart. He doesn't feel like a normal human being.

Well, he wasn't. No, exactly. And he's caught in this terrible position where he's not really human, he's not really alive in that way, and he feels cut off, distant. He doesn't have good relationships. And so it's kind of funny that that started us down, kind of the.

Eric Barker
The big shift towards individualism that happened throughout the 19th, 20th, and now the 21st century. Well, it's hard to get the ladies when you've got these little plugs coming out of your neck. And. You know, I think that's a. That's like a real turn off.

Mike Carruthers
So does love conquer all? I don't know where that comes from, but it sounds. It doesn't sound right. It goes all the way. That goes, actually, all the way back to ancient Rome.

Eric Barker
That's been around a while. And we all know it's like the United States roughly has a 40% divorce rate now. So, obviously, love doesn't conquer all. And there's been a lot of negative shifts in marriage where it's become less stable. Like I said, 40% divorce rate.

But that is leveled off. But it's leveled off largely because fewer people are getting married. But while that may be a negative, the interesting flip to this is that before we had culture, we had groups, we had everything that kind of held marriage together that acted as constraints and boundaries, but that also limited people. So now there's a lot more variability in marriage. Now, of course, that leads to divorce.

But on the flip side, the positive is, if people put in the time, if they put in the effort, if they're proactive about sustaining and vitalizing their marriage, they can have the best marriages ever. This is work by Eli Finkel at Northwestern University that the people at the high end, the happiest marriages, are now happier than any marriage in history. It's just that now love has gone from conquering all to winner take all, where the people at the far end of the happiness are super happy, but a lot more people are falling at the tail end as well. So we need to work a little harder. But if we do, we can have the best marriages ever.

Mike Carruthers
So you looked at the phrase, can you judge a book by its cover as it relates to people? So explain what you mean by that. And what you discovered we have this image of Sherlock Holmes being able to immediately look at people and dissect them, be able maybe to be able to detect lies, to be able to read their thoughts and feelings. And I just wanted to see, it's like, can we judge a book by its cover? Should we judge a book by its cover?

Eric Barker
And basically, when you look at the preponderance of the research, we're really bad at this. When it comes to meeting strangers, we only predict their thoughts and feelings accurately 20% of the time. With friends, that hits 30%, and with spouses, it only hits 35%. So whatever you think is on your spouse's mind, two thirds of the time, you're wrong. We can improve that a little bit by being more motivated.

When we feel like there's a loss or gain, our brains will ramp up a little bit. So people on first dates are actually better people, readers than we are in general. That said, there's kind of a low ceiling on how good we can get at this. And what I found in the research is that rather than trying to make ourselves better at reading people because we're only so good at that, the better strategy is actually to try to make others more readable, to get them to send stronger signals that we can use to better understand them. Yeah, well, that sounds like that would be very helpful, but how do you do that?

Well, thats something thats really interesting because we have to step outside of just our individual focus. What we need to do is first think about context. If youre just meeting somebody for coffee, they're not going to be sending very strong signals about who they are. But, for instance, what if you were to play basketball with someone? You'd see them quickly making decisions.

You'd see, are they a team player? You'd see, do they cheat? You'd learn a lot more from seeing people interacting with their environment, interacting with others. That gives us a lot more information than when we're just sitting there. They're not doing anything, and we can only, you know, work from what they're telling us.

A second powerful thing is to involve other people in the process. I think we can all agree that if you only dealt with someone in the presence of their boss, you're probably not going to see the full them, you know? So interacting other people can show us different facets, different sides of someone. Beyond that, we, we need to get past talking about the weather. There's research that has shown that, you know, when people actually talk about controversial topics, you get a more accurate read.

People enjoy the conversation, more surprisingly. But we get to see how reactive they are. How do they react to more emotional topics? We get past the pat lines and the politeness. We get a better read on who they are.

So by looking at context involving other people and talking about more controversial topics, we can get people to send stronger signals by which we can better read them. I find that number that you gave, that we only are right about 35% of the time of what our partner is thinking or what kind of mood they're in. Is that. Am I correct? That's what you said, 35%.

Yeah. It's startling. I mean, that's ridiculous. It's really funny. But how many times have you or I been misread by somebody else we're talking to?

What's interesting on the flip side of that is while we're very poor at empathically reading others, one thing that we're actually surprisingly good at is first impressions, is when meeting someone for the first time, our ability to pick up on who they are in general is probably about 70% accurate. There's a lot of research on what's called thin slicing, where if you show someone a short video a few minutes long of a teacher in a classroom, just watching, a few minutes with the sound off, just a few minutes of watching them, people can judge with a fairly high accuracy how competent this person is and a number of other personality traits, about 70% accuracy when we're first meeting someone. But the double edged sword of first impressions is that while 70% is good, it's much better than 35%. However, that's also a d in school. So 70% is good.

But the problem with first impressions is that while they're pretty accurate, we tend to lock onto them. First impressions do stick, so what we need to do to read people better is to be ready to revise those first impressions, because otherwise they stick with us. And if they're inaccurate, it can be really hard for someone to get out of that trap of how we have judged them. We're discussing the science of relationships and why so much of what we believe about relationships turns out to be wrong. My guest is Eric Barker.

Mike Carruthers
He's author of a book called plays well with others. A shout out to Clareton for supporting this episode and providing us with samples. You see, for as long as I can remember, I have had to deal with seasonal allergies, stuffy nose, watery eyes, the whole deal. And the worst for me is it messes up my sleep. I wake up cause I can't breathe right.

And during the day well, you know, if I'm working and I'm all stuffed up, then my voice sounds weird and this is how I make my living. Luckily for those of us who live with the symptoms of allergies, we can live Claritin clear with claritin D. I use it and if you struggle with allergies, you should too. Designed for serious allergy sufferers, claritin D has two powerful ingredients in just one pill that relieve your allergy symptoms and decongest your nose so you can breathe better. Ive been using claritin D for years because it takes care of the problem.

Ready to live? As if you dont have allergies, its time to live. Claritin clear, fast and powerful relief is just a quick trip away. Find claritin D at the pharmacy counter. Ask for claritin D at your local pharmacy counter.

You dont even need a prescription. Go to claritin.com right now for a discount so you can live Claritin clear. Use as directed this episode is brought. To you by Shopify. Whether you're selling a little or a lot, Shopify helps you do your thing.

Bumble Advertisement
However you cha ching from the launch your online shop stage all the way to the we just hit a million orders stage. No matter what stage you're in, Shopify's there to help you grow. Sign up for a dollar one per month trial period@shopify.com. Specialoffer all lowercase. That's shopify.com specialoffer.

Mike Carruthers
So Eric, what in doing this research was the one or one of the things that you found that you believed that you found to be not true? If there is one? You know, much like many people, I really love the idea of reading body language. And subconsciously, there are all cues that we pick up on that help us size people up. But conscious reading of body language is actually not supported at all by the research.

Eric Barker
We're really bad at it. The truth is that if you want to try and look for cues to try and read people better, forget body language. What we need to think about actually more is their voice. Because when we can hear someone but we can't see them, our empathic accuracy only drops off about 4%. But when we can see someone but we can't hear them, empathic accuracy drops off 54%.

So the voice has a lot more tells in it than what we see in somebody's movements. Because the issue with body language is we can't be sure if they're shivering because they're cold or they're shivering because they're nervous, we can't be sure if they're drumming their fingers because that's a habit they have or if they're bored. We don't know what those things mean, especially with new people. We don't have a baseline, so we can never really know. So we should really focus on the voice over, looking at body language.

Mike Carruthers
And when we're listening to voice, for those clues, is it just instinct? We just sort of know it, or do you have to be trained in how to do it? No, our instincts are generally pretty good when it comes to voice. They didn't in that study with the 4% versus 54% drop off, they didn't give anybody training. So our voice, you know, we are pretty good at picking up on voice versus the subtleties and nuances of body language, are very idiosyncratic.

Eric Barker
They're not as consistent. So we can kind of trust our judgment a little bit better when it comes to voice. Anything else that really shocked you when you looked at this, anything that turned the tables for you? One thing that was really interesting that I found was, in terms of detecting lies, we're absolutely terrible at it. We only detect lies, I think, at about a 52% accuracy.

So basically, it's a coin flip. And while college students lie in about a third of conversations, adults lie in about 20% of conversations. We lie most to mom, but we tell the biggest lies to our spouses. But lie detection is always proven really hard. And most of the stuff we hear in terms of the polygraph, for instance, doesn't work because measuring stress and anxiety, that's not a proven lie detective detection method.

What does work is that telling lies is actually pretty cognitively intensive. You know, we have to think a lot. You have to think about the true story. You have to think about the fake story. You have to make sure nobody's catching on to you.

You have to update those models in real time. So what actually works in terms of lie detection is upping the cognitive load. Making the person think harder is actually what has been shown to make a big difference. And how we can do that is by asking unanticipated questions. When we ask questions that the liar hasn't prepared for, they'll slow down.

They'll have to think. They'll stumble on their words, and we're much, much more likely to pick up on someone who's not telling us the truth. Again, it's one of those things you like to think you're good at. I like to think I'm able to tell, like, when my kids are lying, and I'm probably not anywhere near as good as I think I am. Well, the tricky part there is that exactly what you're saying, where we don't get good feedback about whether we're lie detectors usually is because we don't.

If somebody lied to us and it was successful, we never find out. The flip side is very different. Liars, if they get caught, they realize, oh, that didn't work. They're starting. They're getting feedback on whether their lives worked.

Should they give more details? Should I say it like this? Improving. While we're generally not improving, and that puts us at a great disadvantage. So let's talk about friendship.

Mike Carruthers
You looked at the idea of a friend in need is a friend indeed. So what about friendship? The friendship research was interesting, frankly, because there just wasn't as much of it. I really had to dig, because with the love chat, there's plenty of research on marriage and relationships and kids and families, but on friends, not nearly as much. And that shows through, because that's an aspect of, frankly, from many parts of friendship.

Eric Barker
Friendship doesn't get the respect it deserves, and it should, because research by Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman shows that friendships make us happier than any other relationship. And even within a marriage, it's the friendship aspect of marriage that is the most rewarding in terms of happiness. And the reason for this, you know, is because with most of our other relationships, there's some sort of an institution, a contract of sorts, that keeps us in there. Friendship doesn't have anything like that. Somebody doesn't stop your kids, don't stop being your kids.

You know, if you were to stop liking them, your spouse doesn't stop becoming your spouse. If you don't like your boss, doesn't cease to be your boss. But if you stop liking your friends, they're not your friends anymore. It's friendship is completely voluntary. And so because of that, that fragility of friendship keeps its purity.

So we really enjoy friends because if we didn't, we wouldn't see them anymore. So friendship is incredibly rewarding, but it kind of doesn't get the support and attention that it needs. And we really should think more about it because like I said, it brings us more happiness than any other relationship. My observation is that women do friendship. Better than men, and you are 100% true.

This is totally true, is that most men, especially as they age, especially after they get married, men tend to, their spouse tends to be the center of their social world, whereas women are much better at keeping up their friendships. This has a lot of negative effects on men, including health, because there's a, a lot of research that basically shows if you look at women recovering from breast cancer, a spouse has no effect versus the number of friends. Close friends they have predicts recovery. Men recovering from a heart attack spouse has zero effect, but their friends, the friends tell you, you know, how, how many friends they have says how likely they are to recover. Robin Dunbar, a professor at Oxford, he looked at all the research on happiness, I'm sorry, on health, and he basically said, what will predict whether you are alive one year after having a heart attack?

He says, basically, it comes down to, do you smoke and do you have close friendships? Sure. Nutrition, exercise, all that other stuff is nice, but heads and tails above everything else, don't smoke and have good friendships that was able to predict who would be alive a year after a heart attack. What's one other thing, because we're almost out of time. What's one other thing that you found in this research that I find so fascinating that maybe surprised you?

John Gottman, who's the leading researcher on love and marriage, basically found that 69% of ongoing issues that couples have never get resolved. And what's interesting about that is that it's true of unhappy couples and it's true of happy couples. We are often much too focused on trying to resolve conflict as opposed to regulate it. There's a lot of things that will just never get ironed out, and that's okay. It's true with couples that are happy.

If we focus on we have to resolve, typically, we don't. What drives marriages into the ground isn't fighting. Yelling and screaming only ends marriages about 40% of the time. The rest of the time, it's usually due to the fact that people aren't communicating, they're not talking. Gottman found that complaining is actually a positive thing in relationships because it raises issues and they're allowed to be addressed.

You can discuss them, but when we don't raise issues, they can't be solved. And in our head, things often turn very negative. We start to assume that our partner has bad intentions. They're doing it deliberately. They meant to do that.

And when we start to personalize it, that's when things, he calls it negative sentiment override, where basically, instead of that positive idealizing, positive bias of love, it turns to a very negative thing that's bad. So we need to be talking. In any relationship, you know, you need to be talking. But especially in love, ongoing communication is essential. Gottman was pretty funny about it.

He said, you know, if you've been in a long term relationship and you've never had a big fight, please do that immediately.

Mike Carruthers
Well, this is really fun to pull the covers back on relationships and look at the science behind it as compared to what we believe about relationships and how those things reconcile or don't. My guest has been Eric Barker. The name of his book is plays well with others. The surprising science behind why everything you know about relationships is mostly wrong. And there's a link to that book in the show notes.

Eric Barker
Thanks, Eric. Families have a lot going on. Let Ollie help manage the mental load with new cognitive help. Supplements for everyone four and up like delicious lollipocus pops or lolli mellow pops for kids and for parents. Try three new brainy chews to help you focus, chill out, or get energized.

Bumble Advertisement
Find these cognitive health buddies for the whole fam@ollie.com. Dot that's olly.com dot. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. As a listener to something you should know, I can only assume that you are someone who likes to learn about new and interesting things and bring more knowledge to work for you in your everyday life.

Mike Carruthers
I mean, that's kind of what something you should know was all about. And so I want to invite you to listen to another podcast called TEd Talks Daily. Now, you know about TED talks, right? Many of the guests on something you should know have done TED talks. Well, you see, Ted Talks Daily is a podcast that brings you a new TED talk every weekday.

In less than 15 minutes, join host Elise Hu. She goes beyond the headlines so you can hear about the big ideas shaping our future, learn about things like sustainable fashion, embracing your entrepreneurial spirit, the future of robotics, and so much more. Like I said, if you like this podcast, something you should know, I'm pretty sure you're going to like Ted talks daily. And you get TEd talks daily wherever you get your podcasts, theres a word a lot of us have trouble with, and the word is no. We cant say it or we dont say it often enough.

Ill bet youve said yes to someone in the last week or so and wish you hadnt. But you dont want to let people down. You want to be the kind of person who helps out. Youre a team player. You hate to disappoint.

Well, Warren Buffet had a great quote. He said, the difference between successful people and really successful people is that really successful people say no to almost everything. So how can you say no to people and not feel guilty about it? Well, here with some great advice is Michael Tugeas. He's a best selling author, and he has a book out called no will set you free.

Hi, Michael. Thank you for having me. So no will set you free. What does that mean? Free from what?

Michael Tougias
Set you free from other people's agendas. We're constantly being pulled in different directions, and research has shown just how uncomfortable people are saying no or no thank you to a friend asking a favorite or even a stranger asking a favor. In fact, one study, strangers were asked to do all sorts of crazy things. And the people, you know, who were recruited to ask them thought, oh, they'll never say yes to this. But they did because, not because they wanted to do it, but they later said it was because they're so uncomfortable saying no.

They agreed to do things they didn't even want to do. And I think there's a little bit of that in all of us. Yeah. Well, I think there's this sense that if you say no, if you adopt a philosophy of saying no, that you're being pretty selfish and you're letting other people down and, gee, I don't want to do that. Exactly.

And I do think that's where the origin comes from of why we say yes. But if you take a step back and think, okay, if I say no, I'm leaving more time for the things that are really important in my life. And they may not just be your own goals and your own family. It could be helping someone in need. And sometimes it could be as simple as someone who talks and talks and talks on the phone.

But you're not being selfish at all because you're leaving that time for what's important to you or someone who's really in need. And the people that you say no to, I think we think when we say no that theyre devastated, that theyre going to hate us forever. And I suspect thats often not the case. Exactly. Theres even a phrase psychologists use for that very feeling that we have, and its the harshness bias is what they use, that we think theyre going to be devastated and theyre really not.

They rebound pretty quickly. You know, sometimes a simple no thank you will do. Other times where you think this person is going to come back to you at a later date, I use an example of how a friend wanted me to go to a Patriots game in the middle of the winter, and that's just not my thing to sit in the cold stance and wait in line. So I had to explain the reasons why I was turning down this really nice offer and trust that his feelings would not be hurt. And I said, sometime we'll watch the game at my house indoors when you don't have tickets.

And he wasn't hurt. He understood. He goes, I get it. So I think we tend to judge the reaction of other people a little too harshly when they usually are respectful of your no. And it's up to you whether you want to give a reason or not.

And you know, Mike, some people are so uncomfortable saying no. I say, in their early stages, don't even use the word no. Say something like, let me sleep on it. Let me check my schedule. Anything to buy you more time.

And for the person who's really uncomfortable saying no, then you can get back to them by email or in a text saying, oh, I can't make it, but thank you for asking. But if you're going to say no, isn't it a little dishonest to say, let me think about it? You already know you're going to say no, so why don't you just say no? I say no now that I'm confident in saying no, but I think for someone who's really new to it, and there's a ton of people that they just can't bring themselves to do it. So I'm like, take baby steps.

Use a fallback approach. Let me get back to you. Let me sleep on it. Let me check my calendar, let me check with my spouse. All these kind of things that buy you a little more time until you're comfortable enough to say no, that just doesn't fit or no.

I prefer not to do that, but that's a few steps down the road for somebody who's been a people pleaser their whole lives. It does seem, though, that there are some people that are easier to say no to than others. It's certainly hard to say no to your kids. It's really hard to say no to your boss. It's very situational.

Mike Carruthers
I mean, I can say no to some people real easy. Other people, it's very difficult. Yes. At another gauge would be the need basis. Is this someone in real need?

Michael Tougias
You know, say that person who asked me to the outdoor football game came to me and said, I'm going through a divorce, I could use some company. Well, then it's going to be a yes from me. There's real need there. He's reaching out. So I think it depends largely on the situation.

Mike Carruthers
And kids are hard it's hard to say no to kids.

Michael Tougias
I'm thinking of one example with my kids. I wanted them to learn a little bit about the value of money, and they wanted both my kids, who were young at the time, say, I don't know, six and eight. They wanted this fan that squirted water, and they had already bought something at the store, and I said no. And they said, oh, this would be fantastic. And I said, if you really want it, use your own money.

And they said, really? And so I said, yeah, when you get home, you're going to pay me for this. So they said, we really want it. So when they got home, I made them pay me for it. And to this day, they bring that up, going, remember the time dad made us pay for the fans?

But when I talk to them, they go, yeah, it was a good lesson. We used that fan one day, and then we stuck it in a drawer. So you have to learn no to your children or you're going to find you've got a 30 year old living in your basement. So what's the advice? Oftentimes I'll say yes to somebody thinking I want to say yes, and later think, God, I wish I'd said no.

Mike Carruthers
How do you decide in the moment yes or no? My litmus test is usually I'll pause and I'll think about the time commitment, and I'll think about, am I excited by this request? If it's to do an activity or to go somewhere, and if I'm not excited and not thinking, this is going to bring me joy, and it's a big time sucker. And I have some other ideas for the use of my time. I will say no.

Michael Tougias
Because, you know, the bottom line is you don't want to be living somebody else's agenda. You want to be living your own path. And our time is the one thing we can control. And most of us, that boils down to weekends and nights after work. And that's where you really need to be firm on how you're going to spend it.

Mike Carruthers
Well, there are also those requests that the implication is that if you say no, you're not a good person, that you're supposed to volunteer here, you're supposed to do this at the school, or you're supposed to do that. And if you say no, even though you may have to, even though you may want to, you're made to feel like you're a bit of a disappointment. And I'm not advocating turning down every opportunity to do volunteer work, but it's truly picking your spots on how it fits with your schedule rather than the requester's schedule because usually the requester is doing it because they need the help now and it fits with their schedule to have you do it on this time, on this date, and you need to push back at times and say, no, I cannot do it next week. My plate's full. I might be able to take a look at this a month from now.

Michael Tougias
Why don't you get back to me? So there's different ways to go about it and not feel like you're not doing your share when it comes to things. But the bottom line is only, you know your own stress level of how much your time is being pulled in different directions. Since the title of your book is no, we'll set you free. The implication there is that when you get good at this, that you'll feel better.

Mike Carruthers
But I would imagine that in the process, if you're used to saying yes, if you're a people pleaser and you start telling people no, you're going to feel lousy. I think you're going to feel liberated. I know I do. When I say no to requests, I go, wow, good thing you did that. You would have been miserable doing that request.

No. I mean, though, in the beginning, if you've been people pleasing all your life and now you're going to try to take a stand here and start that in the beginning, it's going to feel kind of bad because you're the person everybody can rely on, but when will. You ever stop being that person? You know what I mean? You have to start somewhere.

Michael Tougias
And again, it might be with the baby steps of let me get back to you rather than a no, but I think to take back control of your own life, you're going to have to set these boundaries. I'll use an example of, say, a homemaker where nobody else is pitching in and she's raising, if it's a female, she's raising the issue of, hey, I'm doing all the work. Nobody's helping with the dishes, the cleaning, a way to get their attention because none of your talk is working is to go on strike. That'll get their attention in a hurry. And yeah, it may be uncomfortable for a while when the dishes are piling up, but people are going to notice and then you're going to have a sit down meeting and saying, I need help here.

We need to split this equitably. It can't always be me stepping up and doing the work. I also hear this a lot in family situations say it's older parents and the siblings are chipping in, it almost always seems like there's one sibling doing way more than everybody else and the resentment starts forming and you really don't want it to get to that point because then you're going to have issues with your brothers and sisters that might form a chasm between you that never gets resolved. But if you step up in the beginning and say, okay, somebody else needs to pitch in at this point, I've done the last three weeks straight. Well, there are those people, I guess, in everyone's life where you don't even want to ask them because they have set the boundary so clearly that you don't even ask because you know the answer is going to be no.

Mike Carruthers
And in some ways, I kind of admire those people, that they've made it very clear and consistent that, you know, this is where the line is and other people are just not as good at that as he or she is. Yeah, there's no doubt about that. Some people are better than others. I mean, I've come a full 180 to being the ultimate yes man to now carving out time for myself, and I still have slip ups when I kick myself later. Go, why did I agree to that?

Michael Tougias
But usually when the stress levels building in my life, it's my own fault. I can't blame it on somebody else. So, yeah, there's some people that do a better job than me. That's an issue for all of us. But I do think that the beginning is with those baby steps and see what happens of saying, let me get back to you, rather than giving the rote yes, because you've been trained to say yes.

Those people have been doing it for years. They've probably never said a no or never said, I'll get back to you. I may not be able to fit this in. And yet we do say no when we have to. I mean, if somebody asks you to do something and you're going to be out of town, you have to say no.

Mike Carruthers
And that's a good enough reason. But why can't the fact that you don't want to do it also be a good enough reason? Yeah, no, it should be. It should be. But again, I think it's that training when we were kids to be polite, you know, it just goes down the line in terms of society is telling us all the time, go for it, you know, seize the moment.

Michael Tougias
And that's true as long as the moment's going to bring you joy. But there's a flip side, too. And that's having time for yourself. Here's a little litmus test. If there's too much yes in your life, are you stressed from being over scheduled?

Are your closest friends and family members expressing feelings of neglect? Are you getting enough sleep and me time? Are you able to enjoy your favorite pastimes without watching the clock? And that one fit me pretty good. Do you leave tasks unfinished and often need last minute help?

And then lastly, is there one important project you wanted to do for years but never found the time? And wouldn't it be awful to be towards the end of our years and go, wow, I always wanted to do this one thing and just never found the time because I was pulled in a million different directions? To me, that would be the ultimate regret, that you didn't have the wherewithal to say no so that you could focus on the one thing you always wanted to do well. And there is that image too, that saying no is very selfish that you're being. It's all about you and you're not willing to help other people.

Mike Carruthers
And he's always saying no, and you need to be more help, and it's true. And if you're always saying no when it's your turn to step up, if it's a family member or someone in need, that is being selfish. But if you're saying no to all the little things that are pulling at your time, then you're actually creating some space to help the person or the cause in need that's important to you. And it could be as little as saying no to some things. Not to another person, but to some things that are chewing up your time, like social media or long winded phone calls.

Michael Tougias
And you know, the list goes on and on that you're not saying no to another person, but you're cutting back on it. It. I had a friend who said, yeah, you know, through the COVID pandemic, I got in this habit of zooming once a week with this friend, but these zooms went on forever. And I said, well, you know, that's because you agreed to the schedule. It was going to be every Wednesday at 07:00 p.m.

Say, let's get off the schedule and we'll do it as our time allows. So you haven't said no to that friend, but you've definitely said no to every Wednesday. You're going to listen to this person ramble on for 2 hours. What else? Anything else in the research that people would be interested in hearing about?

Mike Carruthers
No. And why it's better to become more of a no person and maybe a little less of a yes person. I looked up some historic nos where people are under pressure to say yes and go with the group. And I'll give one example. John F.

Michael Tougias
Kennedy in the cuban missile crisis. When we discovered the missiles in Cuba, the consensus at his executive meetings, this is his closest advisors in the military, was to immediately strike Cuba right away with a massive airstrike, take out all the soviet installations.

You know, the pressure was enormous on this 45 year old president, but he delayed, he didn't say no right away. It was very interesting. All this is on audiotape, too. He secretly recorded the meetings, but thank God he didn't get pressured into the yes, which is where everybody else at these meetings was heading. And then by the second and third day, he's starting to push back.

Well, if we do that, don't you think this, this and this will happen? And pretty soon it became a firm no, we're not going to do that right away. We're going to take another step first, and that would be the maritime blockade. So I always admire the people that are able to withstand the pressure, the peer pressure, and say, no. Let me think about this, which is in essence what Kennedy did, and then came to the conclusion of, no, I disagree with all of you, and we're going to take this in steps because there's no turning back if we go full at it.

Mike Carruthers
Yeah, well, but the thing I have trouble with about that, let me think about it, is if, you know, you're going to say no, you're really kind of giving them false hope and sucking up the time that they could be looking for somebody else to do it while they're waiting for you to answer. And you know, all along your answer's going to be no. So youre really making it harder on them. Thats a good point. And I think thats true.

Michael Tougias
So I think when youre comfortable saying no, youre going to want to say it right off the bat. But for the people who are very uncomfortable and have really never said no before, just getting the word out of their mouth no, thank you is almost impossible for them. Ive talked to some of these people and I said, then go to plan B, which is buy yourself more time and then you can deliver the news. Right. Well, and it depends on what they're asking and it depends on a lot of things.

Eric Barker
Exactly. But you could also telegraph, I guess you could say, well, I probably can't, but let me think about it. So you're at least letting them know that this is most likely going to be a no. I think that's a great early stage step. If you can't come right out and.

Michael Tougias
And do the no, and maybe you're unsure of yourself. Maybe you're not even 100% sure. Maybe it's a maybe. And so I agree. That's not a bad approach of saying it doesn't look good.

But let me check a few things, and I will get back to you. You know, as I think about it, many of the times that I've said yes and later wished I'd said no, I had a sense at the time. At the time I was asked, I probably knew that I didn't really want to do it, and I ignored that and said yes anyway. And maybe I and everybody else needs to pay attention to that. Michael Tugeas has been my guest, and the name of his book is no.

Mike Carruthers
We'll set you free, and you'll find a link to his book in the show notes. Thanks, Michael. Okay, bye bye. Now.

What do you call a bunch of bananas? Well, I call them a bunch of bananas, but technically, that's wrong. A group of bananas, the way you see them in the supermarket, is called a hand, and the individual bananas are called fingers. Bananas grow in clusters with tiers. Each tier or hand can have up to 20 bananas on it.

A bunch of bananas refers to the entire cluster with all the tiers. Commercially, that's referred to as a banana stem. And since we're getting so technical. Why are we getting so technical? The banana tree is not really a tree at all.

It's actually a giant herb, and the banana is the fruit of that herb. Bananas are believed to be the first fruit ever cultivated by human beings. They didn't come to this country until 1876 and were first seen at the Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition. And that is something you should know. If you will tell your friends about this podcast, then they, too, can impress their friends with their knowledge of bananas.

So please share something you should know with someone you know. I'm Micah Ruthers. Thanks for listening today to something you should know. The biggerpockets portfolio of podcasts are worthy of your investment. We're having a real conversation as real real estate investors.

New episodes available every day. It's important to buy where it makes money and not necessarily where you want. To travel to bigger pockets on the market. Rookie Real Estate or money podcast? The purpose of flipping is to create.

Michael Tougias
More cash so then you can reinvest into other types of properties. The Biggerpockets podcast on YouTube or wherever you listen?

Mike Carruthers
The Biggerpockets podcast on YouTube or wherever you listen?