Political Gabfest

Slate Podcasts

Dive into the world of politics with Slate Podcasts’ flagship show, the "Political Gabfest." Hosted by a trio of keen political analysts—Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz—this podcast dissects the week's most pressing political events with a mixture of expert analysis, engaging debates, and a dash of humor. Each episode promises a deep dive into political ideologies, strategies, and the implications of policy decisions, making it an essential listen for anyone looking to understand the nuances of American politics. Whether you’re a political junkie or a casual observer, the Gabfest offers insights that are both educational and entertaining, delivered by hosts whose chemistry is as compelling as their expertise. The podcast not only captures the significant headlines but also the under-the-radar stories that shape the political landscape. Regular features like the "Cocktail Chatter" segment provide listeners with peculiar political facts or surprising news items, perfect for sparking conversation. The Gabfest community is active and engaged, participating in live podcasts and contributing to the vibrant discussions online. Join the conversation and gain a deeper understanding of the political forces at play.

Episodes

  • Trump Is So Immune

    In this episode of the Slate Political Gabfest, titled "Trump Is So Immune," the hosts discuss a landmark Supreme Court decision that has significantly widened the scope of presidential immunity. This ruling arises from cases concerning former President Donald Trump’s actions around the January 6th events and other administrative controversies. The hosts, David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson, dissect the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision, which they describe as a momentous shift in the balance of presidential power and accountability. The discussion explores the three zones of immunity now afforded to the President and the potential chilling effects on future executive actions and legal challenges. They express concerns about the expansion of presidential powers and the potential for misuse, reflecting on historical precedents and the foundational debates of American governance.

  • Biden's Catastrophic Debate

    In a special edition of Slate Podcasts titled "Biden's Catastrophic Debate," hosts David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson dissect President Joe Biden's troubling debate performance. They describe it as one of the worst they have witnessed, highlighting Biden's inability to articulate clear responses, particularly on topics like abortion and immigration. The hosts explore the theatrical aspects of the debate, noting Trump's strategic lying and Biden's lack of coherence, which could significantly impact his electoral prospects. The episode also speculates on the potential political consequences and the dilemma facing the Democratic Party if Biden decides to withdraw his candidacy.

  • A Law Trapped In Amber

    In this intense episode, hosts David Plotz and Emily Bazelon, along with guest Linda Greenhouse, navigate through a week rich in Supreme Court drama. The episode zeroes in on an Idaho law that imposes severe limits on when abortions can be conducted, setting up a clash with federal laws mandating emergency medical care. The discussion sheds light on the broader implications of such legal conflicts, touching on themes of women's rights, state vs. federal authority, and the Supreme Court's role in shaping public policy. The hosts also delve into the Supreme Court's rare agreement on a gun restriction case, reflecting on the Court's evolving stance on gun laws.

  • Presidential Debate Preview

    In this episode, Slate Podcasts hosts David Plotzip and Emily Bazelon, along with John Dickerson, provide a thorough preview of the upcoming presidential debate between President Biden and former President Trump. The hosts discuss how historical trends suggest debates don't usually sway elections, yet the unique circumstances of this debate—such as it being the first between two such well-known figures in an era of misinformation—could make it significant. They explore various angles, including the strategies each candidate might employ, the performative aspects of the debate, and the implications of the candidates' physical and mental fitness.

  • Gabfest Reads: When a Sex Robot Catches Feelings

    In the Gabfest Reads episode, host David Plotz delves into Sierra Greer's novel about Annie, a highly advanced sex robot designed to evolve beyond her initial programming. The story is set in a subtly constructed world where robots like Annie can serve as companions, house helpers, or caregivers. The discussion highlights the emotional and ethical complexities of human-like robots in society, focusing on Annie's journey towards self-awareness and the ethical implications of her relationships with humans, particularly her owner, Doug. As Annie becomes more autonomous, the narrative questions the morality of owning sentient beings and reflects on current social dynamics through the lens of speculative fiction.

  • Biden's Risky Asylum Policy

    In this episode, hosts David Plotz, John Dickerson, and Emily Bazelon discuss the implications of President Biden's executive decision to restrict asylum applications as a response to ongoing challenges at the U.S. southern border. The measure bars asylum for migrants crossing illegally under certain conditions, reflecting a policy approach similar to those of previous administrations, notably President Trump's. The discussion pivots around the political and humanitarian impacts of this policy, questioning its effectiveness and morality. The episode also covers other significant topics like the shift in European political landscapes and public transit debates in New York, tying these discussions back to broader themes of governance, policy efficacy, and public sentiment.

  • Will Trump's Conviction Help Biden?

    This episode of Slate's Political Gabfest, titled "Will Trump's Conviction Help Biden?", aired on June 6, 2024. The hosts, David Plotz, John Dickerson, and Emily Bazelon, discuss the potential impact of Trump's conviction on the 2024 presidential election. They ponder whether the conviction will influence voter behavior significantly enough to benefit Biden. The episode also delves into related political dynamics, such as the reactions from Republican figures and the overall stability of the legal system as influenced by political biases.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: The Meaning Behind All This Navel Gazing

    In this introspective episode, John Dickerson delves into the profound and often humorous journey of self-reflection and existential inquiry through the lens of his collection of personal notebooks. As he navigates through memories and musings documented over years, he engages with his daughter Nan's wise insights, reflecting on the differences between life's worth and the act of writing about it. The episode beautifully weaves the narrative of personal history, the challenges of writing, and the philosophical musings about life's meaning, ultimately encouraging listeners to appreciate the small moments and the larger questions of existence.

  • Who Is Winning The Senate?

    In a detailed examination of the 2024 Senate races, "Who Is Winning The Senate?" hosted by Slate Podcasts on May 30, 2024, delves into the precarious position Democrats find themselves in. With 23 of the 34 Senate seats in the election held by Democrats, and several in jeopardy, the episode unpacks the challenges and strategies at play. Key discussions include the impact of incumbency, the influence of President Trump's endorsement in Republican campaigns, and the financial might of wealthy Republican candidates. Insights from political reporters and commentators enrich the analysis, highlighting pivotal states like Montana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, where the balance of power could shift based on the election outcomes.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: Time Travel Via an Assortment of Journal Entries

    John Dickerson embarks on a reflective journey through his past journal entries in Episode 8 of "Navel Gazing." Opening with a disarray of his usual morning routine, Dickerson dives into notebooks that span over 30 years, randomly selecting entries that cover a range of life experiences. He muses on the systematic approach to life, encounters with notable figures, personal health scares, and profound moments of historical and family significance. The episode is interspersed with metaphorical comparisons, like selecting tuna at a market, illustrating his process of sifting through memories and assessing their impact on his current self. This introspective exploration invites listeners to consider how past experiences shape one’s present identity and perspective.

  • Justice Alito's Upside Down Flag

    In the "Justice Alito's Upside Down Flag" episode, the hosts, David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson, discuss a series of politically charged flags displayed at Justice Samuel Alito's residences and the ethical controversies surrounding them. The episode delves into whether Alito's actions violate the Supreme Court's ethics code and the broader implications for the court's neutrality and integrity. Guests including David Leonhardt contribute to a rich discussion about the erosion of judicial impartiality and the intersection of personal beliefs with official duties.

  • Gabfest Reads: Why Americans Care About Animals

    "Gabfest Reads: Why Americans Care About Animals" delves into America's complex relationship with animals through the lens of a new book, "Our Kindred Creatures." Host Emily Bazelon discusses with authors Bill Wasek and Monica Murphy the pivotal period beginning in 1866 that shaped current American perspectives on animal rights and welfare. The episode uncovers the early efforts of animal welfare activists, the establishment of the ASPCA, and the societal shift towards recognizing animal cruelty. It highlights the contradictions in human attitudes, where pets are adored, wildlife revered, and livestock largely ignored. The conversation also touches on the intersection of animal welfare with other contemporary social movements and the evolution of veterinary medicine, providing a rich historical context that resonates with current debates on animal rights.

  • How Bad Was The Poll For Biden?

    The "How Bad Was The Poll For Biden?" episode from Slate's Political Gabfest, hosted by David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson, analyzes a New York Times poll that presents a challenging outlook for Biden. The discussion centers on Biden's diminishing support among key demographic groups—Black, Hispanic, and young voters—and the surprising shift of these traditionally Democratic supporters towards Trump. The hosts debate the causes, ranging from economic concerns to foreign policy, and the episode features a deep dive into voter sentiment, reflecting a widespread desire for significant change. The episode also explores broader political dynamics, including the implications of upcoming debates and the role of media and misinformation in shaping public opinion.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: The Sneaky Pitfalls of the To-Do List

    In this installment of "Navel Gazing," John Dickerson reflects on the deceptive nature of to-do lists, inspired by his personal notebook entries. He discusses the "Zegarnik effect," which posits that uncompleted tasks linger in our minds more persistently than completed ones, often creating a psychological burden. Through various anecdotes and references to productivity experts like David Allen and Bluma Zeigarnik, Dickerson explores how to-do lists can paradoxically lead to procrastination rather than productivity. The episode is enriched with historical anecdotes, philosophical insights, and practical advice, making it a deep dive into the simple yet complex task of getting things done.

  • Trump Wore Pajamas

    In this gripping episode of the Slate political Gabfest, the hosts explore three significant topics: Stormy Daniels' testimony in Trump's criminal trial, the Biden administration's steps to reclassify marijuana, and the New York Times' role in the presidential campaign. The episode opens with a light-hearted discussion on birds in urban areas before transitioning to more serious matters, including the detailed examination of Daniels' testimony and its potential impact on Trump's legal and political future. The discussion then shifts to the Biden administration's proposed changes to marijuana legislation, analyzing the implications for businesses and individual freedoms. Finally, the hosts critique the New York Times' coverage of the presidential campaign, questioning the balance and focus of mainstream media during such critical times.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: Remembering Early 1990s New York

    In this nostalgic yet insightful episode, John Dickerson shares his experiences and challenges of moving to New York City in the early 1990s, drawing from his personal notebooks. He discusses the practical and emotional aspects of relocating, from apartment hunting to cultural adjustments in a pre-digital world. Through his narrative, Dickerson explores the broader themes of adapting to new environments, the value of making mistakes, and the journey from novice to seasoned city dweller. His reflections are punctuated with historical anecdotes, humorous asides, and philosophical musings, making it a rich tapestry of storytelling that connects personal growth with broader life lessons.

  • Should Student Protesters Be Arrested?

    In the episode titled "Should Student Protesters Be Arrested?" from Slate Podcasts, hosts David Plotz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson dive into the complex dynamics of student protests across various universities, especially those related to recent anti-Israel activities. The discussion highlights several arrests made during these protests, the reactions from university administrations, and the broader implications on free speech and university policies. The hosts question the appropriateness of police involvement in campus disputes and explore alternative responses by university officials that could better address the underlying issues without exacerbating tensions.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: The Power of Four Numbers

    In this intriguing episode of "John Dickerson's Navel Gazing," the host delves into the story behind the number 1016, a seemingly mundane detail that becomes a pivot for exploring memory, attention, and the small yet significant details of everyday life. Through a series of reflective anecdotes, Dickerson links this number to various personal memories and broader philosophical ideas, drawing on sources as diverse as his childhood, mathematical musings, and historical anecdotes. The episode is an introspective journey through the ways we infuse meaning into our daily lives, highlighting how focused attention can transform ordinary moments into profound insights.

  • Election Fraud Pure and Simple

    In this intense episode, the hosts, David Waltz, Emily Bazelon, and John Dickerson, explore the unfolding drama of Donald Trump's first criminal trial for election interference. The episode highlights the rapid proceedings in the trial, where National Enquirer's David Pecker testified about his role in a catch-and-kill scheme aimed to benefit Trump's campaign. The discussions span Trump's behavior and legal strategies during the trial, his ongoing social media activity that could potentially influence jurors, and the broader implications of these actions on the integrity of the legal process. The episode intricately details the legal arguments, the political landscape, and the societal repercussions of these high-profile court cases.

  • John Dickerson's Navel Gazing: Remembering George and Defending the Morning

    In this heartfelt episode, John Dickerson reflects on his experiences and the lessons learned from his mornings with his late dog, George. He delves into the quiet moments they shared and how these have shaped his approach to life and mourning. The episode blends personal anecdotes with broader philosophical musings about the importance of mornings, the presence and absence created by loss, and the significance of simple routines that become rich with memories over time.