Primary Topic
This episode of Pod Save America, featuring Tim Miller as a guest, dives into Donald Trump's controversial new interview where he outlines his vision for a second presidential term, which has sparked significant concerns regarding its authoritarian undertones.
Episode Summary
Main Takeaways
- Trump's vision for a second term includes authoritarian policies that could undermine democratic norms.
- The former president remains vague and non-committal on critical issues, revealing a concerning lack of policy depth or consistency.
- His policies, if implemented, could lead to significant negative impacts on inflation and immigration.
- Trump’s interview serves as a political tool to energize his base by revisiting the promise of controversial policies.
- The episode raises awareness about the critical need for vigilance and resistance against potential authoritarian shifts in U.S. politics.
Episode Chapters
1. Introduction and Context
John Lovett introduces the episode and sets the stage for the discussion on Trump’s latest controversial interview. They discuss the broader political landscape and Trump's potential impact if re-elected. John Lovett: "Today, we delve into Trump's recent sit-down that has everyone talking."
2. Analyzing Trump’s Interview
The hosts dissect the interview, critiquing Trump's positions on abortion, Taiwan, and his authoritarian leanings. Tim Miller: "Trump's evasion on the abortion question is particularly telling and alarming."
3. Implications for U.S. Policy
Discussion on how Trump’s proposed policies could affect domestic and international issues. John Lovett: "These policies could drastically alter the U.S. standing on the world stage and its internal socio-political dynamics."
4. Concluding Thoughts
The hosts summarize their thoughts and discuss the importance of political engagement and awareness. Tim Miller: "It's critical that we recognize the signs of authoritarianism and take action."
Actionable Advice
- Stay informed about political developments to effectively participate in democratic processes.
- Engage in community discussions to foster a broader understanding of the potential impacts of political policies.
- Advocate for transparency and accountability in government to combat authoritarian tendencies.
- Support organizations that promote democratic values and principles.
- Vote in elections to ensure that leaders who value democracy are in positions of power.
About This Episode
Lovett and guest host Tim Miller discuss Donald Trump's mind-boggling interview with TIME Magazine, in which he details his plans to use the military to deport immigrants, allow states to monitor women's pregnancies, jack up prices on all imported goods, and much more. Plus, the Biden administration moves to reclassify weed, riot police move in on campus protestors, and Drew Barrymore asks Kamala Harris for a very special favor.
People
Donald Trump, Tim Miller, John Lovett
Companies
Time Magazine
Books
None
Guest Name(s):
Tim Miller
Content Warnings:
None
Transcript
Boox
Pod save America is brought to you by Boox. This Mother's day, give mom her flowers. She deserves the best. That's why you should send her farm fresh flowers from boox. That's short for bouquets. And right now, you can get 25% off your entire boox purchase. Here's why everyone likes the boox company. Boux is different. Their flowers are cut fresh and sourced directly from the best flower farms, so they can last way longer. They even have flowers grown on the side of a volcano. Wow. Bouche has modern designs and unique flowers you can't find anywhere else. Boox is simple. You go online, pick the delivery date, and you're done. Mother's day is May 12. Don't miss the chance to thank your mom. Order your books now. And with 20% off, you can send some to mom, wife, aunt, and even grandma. I am very happy that I'm reading this ad, because now I'm remembering when Mother's day is. And I'm going to order a whole bunch of books because they're fantastic flowers. Go to books.com and use promo code crooked for 25% off. That's bouqs.com promo code crooked. Books promo code crooked.
Tim Miller
Hey, y'all. It's Tim Miller, crooked Media's favorite cuckservative. I'm now hosting the daily Bulwark podcast, which comes out every weekday afternoon, rain or shine, hangover or no hangover. Here's what's special about this podcast and my colleagues at the bull. We are all united in a mission to defend democracy from the burnt Sienna buffoon. And as outcast republicans, we have no future career prospects, so we're free to tell you what we really think. So check out my daily bulwark podcast. Or if once a week is more your speed, there's Lovett's guilty pleasure, the next level podcast featuring me with my colleagues Sarah Longwell and JVL. Check it out. Peace.
John Lovett
Welcome to Pontoon Save America. I'm John Lovett, and joining us, you know him from the bulwark.
You know him from MSNBC.
Tim Miller
You know, from being a little drunk alive with Lovett. That's right.
John Lovett
It's Tim Miller.
Thanks for.
Tim Miller
How you doing, bro?
John Lovett
Thanks for being here, Tim.
Tim Miller
I'm so excited. I think this is it. This is official now. I just for listeners, you know, you might have somebody in your life that was maybe a friend of me at one stage, and maybe you had a little tension with at one point. Over and over the years, you grow and you grow a bond and appreciation for one another, and it blossoms into a real, real friendship. And I feel like that's officially happened right now.
John Lovett
Wow.
Tim Miller
At this moment.
John Lovett
And just so everybody knows, his audio did break up for a second. He said sexual tension.
Tim Miller
Yeah, well, that's what we had at one point, but I'm saying now it's blossomed. Something like that.
John Lovett
It is nice. It is nice.
Tim Miller
It's something, you don't know that this is coming. 20 year olds out there, this is happening for you in your forties. There's somebody in your life right now, and you're like, that guy. Never. But then when you're 40, you're like, wow, we like each other a lot.
John Lovett
I never said never. But maybe you did, and that's fine. Yes. When you're 20, you don't know what it's like to be an adult for 20 years.
I know, and that's the beauty of it.
Tim Miller
Anyway, let's talk about Gaza.
John Lovett
But speaking of.
Yeah, and also people that have been an adult for 50 years and don't seem to show it, we have a packed show today. Donald Trump spent some of his precious time outside of a courtroom to do a good old fashioned sit down interview with Time magazine, laying out his vision for a second term. And it's, it's worrying. The Biden administration is reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. While student protests enveloped campus buildings and our national attention, Marjorie Taylor Greene makes her move. Plus, the vice president sits down with Drew Barrymore, and it makes everyone a little uncomfortable. Okay, first up, Trump.
He did something that feels like it's from another era. He sat down for an interview with Time magazine in Palm beach. Lasted over an hour. All the, all the pomp and circumstance, the description of the room, the transcript has the aid coming in and saying, Mister Trump has to get to dinner. We get some color about the playlist. It's the same playlist. Sinead O'Connor, January 6 choir, the two genders.
And then they did a follow up, 20 minutes conversation. So we'll get to all the details. But just. Were you surprised him to see Donald Trump spend an hour doing this?
Tim Miller
I was. I have to be honest. There is a print Time magazine that, like, appears that you can get now, is that it? That still exists?
John Lovett
I believe so.
Tim Miller
Like an airport.
So that was that. It all made sense. Once I realized that still existed. I personally did not know that. I thought time had gone fully digital, and I was like, Mister Trump might be an idiot, you know, and he might had the wool pulled over his eyes. A couple times. But he certainly would not do an interview because he wanted fake digital cover. I mean, this man would require a real physical cover, and then he would do an interview where he shames himself and really freaks everybody out about what a Trump term would look like and provides a political gift to Joe Biden. So I do. It makes sense for then. Once I knew that, that Trump could have the time cover that he could frame because that's what he really values. And then once I interviewed the reporter this morning, Eric Cordelessa, and great reporter, tough interview. So please don't take this the wrong way, Eric, but he does give off. Like, I got drunk with Madison Cawthorn at a Duke lacrosse party vibes. And so, like, once I spent more time talking to him, I was like, oh, yeah, okay, this makes sense. The Trump people felt like this guy was one of them. You know, he's going to get his cover and, you know, consequences be damned.
John Lovett
Yeah. So, you know, the, the, the 1980s Trump brain is, oh, Time magazine. I want to be on Time magazine. I want to be on the COVID of Time magazine. And yes, I also associate Time magazine now with the kind of downfall of newsweek and us news. But it's different. But it's different. But there was the other piece of this, too, which is, let's say you were thinking about this in a more traditional way.
The idea behind sitting down for a long print interview, like, there's no video, there's no audio, there's just a transcript, was that there was some value to getting out to elite news followers, to journalists, to close watchers of politics.
The vision, the kind of detailed vision that you wouldn't get on a stump speech, that you won't get in shorter television hits to give people the context of what Trump's trying to do. I don't believe they were doing anything as sophisticated.
But if they were, what on earth were they hoping to accomplish by having the president, the former president, walk through all this stuff?
Tim Miller
Yeah, they wanted to accomplish the physical. He wants the framed.
I just cannot emphasize this one. He wants the framed magazine cover. I know he's already been. The president feels like that seems like small ball for him, but that's what he wanted. Granted that. Now, moving on, what was their strategy beyond that? I really, I do not know. I do not know. I don't, it doesn't seem like he went into the interview, like, going back to my days, you know, we certainly had some fails with my candidates. But if Jeb was going to do a long sit down interview, certainly sometimes he would get stumped or he'd say something wrong or. But we would at least have, like, a proactive message we were trying to get across. Right. That you would. That if you looked at the transcript, you could see that he was coming back to this, whether it was an issue or whether it was a arguments that he was trying to put forth, that was not what this was. It is total stream of consciousness. Donald Trump, it is indistinguishable from his rallies, except for the fact that the reporter, Eric, got to kind of direct him into some, you know, into like a briar pit a little bit on, on abortion in particular, but also some, on some other issues. And there was no sign that they had, like, a proactive message that they were trying to get across.
John Lovett
Yeah. So let's go through this. It was wide ranging.
He says a lot. He also refuses to say a lot. For example, he wouldn't say he'd veto a national abortion ban. He wouldn't say he'd defend Taiwan. He wouldn't say he supports a two state solution between Israel and Palestine. He wouldn't commit to supporting Ukraine's defense. Almost immediately, the Biden campaign went on offense with the interview in particular on Trump's abortion comments. Not just refusing to say he'd veto a band, but when asked whether states should monitor women's pregnancies to see if they violated an abortion ban, Trump said, I think they might do that. On abortion, what jumped out at you? And then we can go beyond that.
Tim Miller
Yeah, well, on abortion, that was like the Chris Matthews moment. And Trump has struggled with this for nine years. Cause he is faking it, right? I mean, that doesn't make the threat any more real to vulnerable women about the laws that we put in place by the types of people that Trump appoints, judgeships in particular, but also into regulatory positions. But he personally, like, obviously doesn't care. And so he doesn't know how to speak the language of pro lifers. Like, somebody who is a genuine pro lifer, I think, would at least be, like, astute enough to be able to move around the question of, are you comfortable with states monitoring women's pregnancies?
And he feels like just by saying, oh, well, states get to decide, like, that's some amulet that protects him from all criticism on this, right? That he's like, oh, I don't know, I guess I'm comfortable. If the states decide to do it, the states decide to do it. And that is a crazy view, right. That is going to be very useful to Biden and ads where he says, essentially, if during a Trump presidency, states want to monitor women's pregnancies so they can determine how far along they are in the gestational period in order to determine whether or not they would have access to an abortion.
You know, that is deep state 1984 type shit targeting women. And he just walked right into it, I think in large part because he hasn't thought about this stuff deeply at all. Never even occurred to him that there might be a question about whether a woman is at six weeks or nine. Right. Like, none of this stuff. He hasn't thought through any of this. And so he's just like, yeah, I guess if the states want to monitor women, they're gonna monitor women.
John Lovett
Yeah. He also, I think he views himself as being very adept at these politics. Now, there's one point he says, did you see everyone adopted my IVF position?
Was asked about what his policy position is going to be on mifepristone. His only response, by the way, he didn't say what it would be, but he says it won't be very surprising, which I took to mean whatever he says, he really hopes people don't pay too much attention to it.
What else jumped out at you?
Tim Miller
Yeah, the Mithapisto thing was funny because he says in the first interview, which is poolside with the Cougars at Mar a Lago and the well done stakes. During that first interview, he's asked about his position on mifepristone, and he's like, I've got a great plan. Won't be that surprising. It'll be out in two weeks. Then there's a follow up phone interview two weeks later. And the first question is, are you ready to share your mifery Stone another two weeks? It's just like the Obamacare healthcare plan. So he still doesn't have that.
But again, I think part of that, I did wonder if, during the first interview, if he knew what mifepristone was and he was buying himself two weeks, but you'd think by the second interview he would. And maybe he's just trying to dodge and by time, because it's similar to the IVF, and this takes you out of, into even pro life people, right, like, are horrified by the idea that women might not have access to miffed Pristone in, like, the first days after, you know, having sex.
John Lovett
Right?
Tim Miller
Like, there are people that are, that are, would support a 15 week ban that think it's crazy that the states want to ban access to miff of pristone, for example. And so, you know, that gets him to a really dicey position. You know, if he, if he isn't, doesn't have a clear answer on that. And he did it over the course of two, two interviews because again, I think that he thinks that he's got to get out of jail free card here with this the states can decide thing. But, but obviously, once you get, once, if you're going to sit down with time for an hour and a half, there are a lot of holes in the states can decide.
John Lovett
Yes. And his ignorance on this is a feature for the, around him who are already planning to use an old federal law to make it impossible to mail abortion drugs to people and deploy the federal government all kinds of ways to make abortion inaccessible, even if they don't pass a national law, even if it still continues to be technically legal in liberal states. So it's, you know, he can say, I don't want to see it too much. From what Trump's perspective is, in a lot of ways it won't matter because will he stand in the way of Congress passes a ban? Of course not. Will he stop some schedule f flunky from doing something horrible in an agency? Of course he won't. He won't have the discipline or attention span to focus on it.
Tim Miller
This is why, just really quick on that. This is why I think that to me, the most telling part of the interview, because of exactly what you're saying, it's kind of like, who cares what Trump's like, random blurts out are on these various policies. In some ways, directionally, we should care. But, like, on the details, what matters is going to be people around him. And at one point, he was asked what he thinks about this notion about hiring people who don't believe in the 2020 election fraud. Like, should that be a litmus test for people that would be hired into your administration? And Trump says essentially yes. Into kind of garbled Trump words like, yes, I would only want, I would feel very, he says something like, I'd feel very strongly against, you know, if somebody is too stupid to realize that the election was stolen from me. Now, to me, that just puts all of this in a very important perspective, which is like, they're gonna be much more judicious is maybe the wrong word, careful about hiring the kookiest people possible. Right. And, like the types. Yeah. And so I thought that, to me, was, was as revealing as any of the policy stuff in the interview and as concluded.
John Lovett
Yeah. So I wanna get to that in 1 second before I wanna get to the implementation. Cause I do think that is, I agree with you. It's just as important. Before we get to that, were there any other policy points that he made or that the piece makes that jumps out for one, that his number one agenda item when he comes in is going to be extending the Bush tax cuts, that some of those tax cuts for the wealthy expire, including the doubling of the estate tax deduction, that those things all expire in 2025. So one of his first orders of business is going to be tax cuts for the wealthy in addition to a border bill, because, of course he killed the border bill. Were there any other policy positions that jumped out at you?
Tim Miller
Yeah. Well, two, as a free market capitalist, the thing that stood out to me was the 10% across the board tariffs, which is an absolutely, absolutely insane policy that if people are concerned about prices, will be disastrous. And he has no, just in general, like, I think it's frustrating to get this across to people. But, like, you know, he says that he want, he's going to fight the inflation area, the bite inflation. Right. And, like, his policies are going to stop inflation, but every policy he has is inflationary. The book extending the Bush tax cuts is inflationary. Fewer immigrants into the country is inflationary.
The number of people that we have in the workforce, tariffs are obviously inflationary. So is there a way to make that message for Biden? I think it's kind of a tough message for Biden to actually implement in a campaign setting. But to me, maybe that's something for Nikki Haley voters that we can use. And then as someone who has feelings and compassion, the deportation plans are absolutely insane. Insane. And he keeps, and he goes along every step the reporter asks him, you know, he's like, well, would you call in the national Guard? Yes. Would you call in the military? Yes. How are you actually going to implement this? Local police forces. We're going to have local cops being our, you know, deportation troopers. And if a local police force doesn't want to be part of the Donald Trump deportation effort, you know, where he specifically cites Operation Wetback, then he's like, well, then we'll stop funding them. Like, we're going to not give funds to police, you know, to local police. You know, so we're going to defund the police. That that will not do illegal deportations. So, I mean, obviously, I think that is the most alarming and the thing that I would be also the most scared about being actually implemented if you were to win, because he, that's the one area where he already has a team of competent sociopaths around him led by Stephen Miller, who would be able to execute on it.
John Lovett
Yeah. And they already, by the way, you know, when they did family separation, it was pushback from what you could call the old guard inside the administration, plus congressional republicans, plus political pressure, ordinary political pressure that caused them to at least sort of second guess what they were doing. I don't think those guardrails exist in a second term.
Tim Miller
No. I mean, and you could see like that. Great. I forget who wrote it. I feel like I should credit her. But the great Atlantic profile that went in so deep into the child separation and how it actually happened, like, the TikTok of it, what it revealed was it really only took Stephen Miller sessions, and there was one other person who were adamant about it and who just kept pushing and pushing at every restraint in the bureaucracy.
And so if you now just imagine a situation where those bureaucratic restraints are, you know, mostly excise through the schedule f changes that they've talked about. And they've, and they, instead of just having two or three people who are like, really get off on child separation, you have like three or four times more that, you know, that get brought in because they've done a more thorough vetting job of staff to ensure that they're fully on board with these deportation plans. I mean, I think that it's really, is really scary, and it's really kind of hard to calculate how much more damage they could do to immigrants and migrants.
John Lovett
And by the way, using schedule f to threaten people who don't, who might otherwise have to go along.
Tim Miller
And by the way, on top of that, using the pardon power to give cover to people who are worried that they're doing something that's illegal. And I think that's the most pernicious thing about his pardoning, you know, about how I'm going to pardon all the January 6 folks. Last time I pardoned Bannon, I pardoned Manafort. Now, he basically would be sending a signal to the shock troops, as Bannon calls them, that they can go ahead and not worry if they're running afoul of various immigration laws while they execute these deportations, because if some rogue liberal judge that Joe Biden appointed or some prosecutor goes after them, Trump will just pardon them. So I think the combining of the pardon with the schedule f, I think it really creates a very different environment for them in a second term.
John Lovett
So I'm glad you pulled out the tariffs and immigration. I think the immigration policy is absolutely horrifying. But I do want to get mercenary about it.
One of the challenges is you want to tell people on imports, hey, if Trump puts a 10% tariff on all these imports, it's actually going to cause the kind of inflation that's been bothering you for years. But I do think the problem is that a lot of people sort this into a made in America american manufacturing bucket. Rightfully so.
But I worry a little bit that when we fight back against that kind of a policy, it's tough to do because you end up, you don't want to sound like a two thousands era Democrat talking about how good NAFTA is going to be. And then you got Ross Perot talking about the sucking sound of american jobs. Like, how do you talk about a policy that I have a feeling at the very least is one that like, maybe people have mixed feelings about because they do worry about manufacturing and they do want jobs to be in the US.
Tim Miller
Yeah. I mean, and Joe Biden kept a lot of his tariffs. Right. So. And he doesn't have a clean message on that. To me, I think it's a negative message that is specifically targeted towards my people, like the Haley voters, the former Republicans. Right. That's like, I don't know, maybe this is, maybe you're running these ads just on Brett Bear show or something. I don't. Or in the Wall Street Journal. But I think if you combine that, Trump was actually pretty mean to be, be, too. I don't want to get into that stuff later. But Trump was pretty harsh on Israel. I don't think he'd be seen as a reliable partner for Israel based on his comments in this interview. The tariffs, if you combine the threats to take out of NATO, you know, this is not a huge segment of the population, but I think that you can micro target some people in the Atlanta Philly burbs, you know, that have been traditional republican voters that also are responsive to the democracy message. And you can layer on top of that, this guy is going to do a 10%. They do like that for that crew, like the 10% tax on tariffs. They respond to it like I would like. This is going to be horrible. This is, you know, anti market. It's going to increase costs. So I think it's more useful for that group to use it to say, to like working class people that are worried about prices at the grocery store. I don't know, it feels like a bank shot and that the campaign probably have better arguments.
John Lovett
He was all over the place on Israel and Palestine. He was all over the place on Bibi. It's actually very hard to figure out what he's even saying.
This is always the problem. And anyone tries to kind of, I don't know, mediate what Trump says into something coherent.
And by the way, that's not a judgment of the journalist or the piece, because the piece is very clear. Like, he is contradictory. And I do think, like the, the reporter really does follow up and push back and come back to things. Trump is just, you know, he's just, it's, it's sand through your fingers, but he's, but just, here's what he said about whether or not there should be a two state solution.
Most people thought it was going to be a two state solution. I'm not sure Tootsie solution anymore is going to work. Everybody was talking about two states. Even when I was there, I was saying, what do you like here? Do you like two states? Now people are going back to, it depends where you are. Every day it changes. Now, if Israel is making progress, they don't want two states. They want everything. And if Israel's not making progress, sometimes they talk about two state solution. Two state solution seemed to be the idea that people like most, the policy or the idea that people liked above. Do you like it? Says the reporter. It depends. When there was a time when I thought two states could work. Now I think two states is going to be very, very tough. I think it's going to be much tougher to get. I also think you have fewer people that like the idea. You had a lot of people that liked the idea four years ago. Today you have far fewer people that like the idea.
Tim Miller
He goes on to mention that Sheldon Adelson was against two states. I think later on, at a different digression, we're not sending our best here.
John Lovett
You mentioned this a few minutes ago.
It's not just about what he's promising, it's how he's promising to implement it. Trump learned a lot of bad lessons during the first term, including the danger of being surrounded by anyone who has their own reputation to protect.
What jumped out at you in terms of how differently he'd go about a second term? He talks about how he would never, he wouldn't wait for people to quit now he'd fire them. You mentioned schedule ridiculous. But you mentioned schedule f. What jumped out at you?
Tim Miller
Yeah.
To me, it's really that litmus test thing just because it's so insane. It's like, it's so insane, you know, and it is, it is. You know, we say this, it's like almost cliche to like, throw, to be like, oh, it's a cult. But like, it is kind of a cult. You have to, you have, in order to join this administration, you have to at least pay lip service to denying reality.
And, and like, that sets a tone and it sets a tone with the pardons. It sets tone with the, with, for the existing people that they know that they could be fired. Where it's like, now you have to watch yourself. And I think I might have told this on this podcast before I forget, but I had a friend that was working at the RNC that was one of the quote unquote good ones who stuck around. He was a lifer at the RNC. And on a couple of conference calls, he's like, I don't know about this thing. Mister Trump is saying it's a little crazy. I don't know if the RNC needs to echo this. He did it like two or three times. Jared Kushner was out on any of these calls. And he gets a call from Jared Kushner out of the blue one day. He's like, are you good? Are we all good? Is everybody on the same page? And that kind of mafioso attitude which they had in the first term, but they didn't know how to implement. I think if you just listen to him now, that's the one thing where it's like they've got a hand on that. Now, they might have people around who aren't true believers, but they're going to be the types of people who are sociopathic enough to not ever reveal that they're not a true believer.
John Lovett
Yeah. I also think it does something else that's also pernicious, which is it makes signing on to be part of this administration a door that locks behind you. You know, Ronald McDaniel thought that she was clean because everybody knew, wink, wink, she wasn't a real Trump person. She just became one on television. And so that even NBC higher up executives thought, oh, they sorted her into the serious old school Republican bucket, not the MAGA maniac bucket. But because she had done so much to defend the lie, there was enough of an uproar that made it impossible for her to kind of be treated like a, be part of polite society. Right? And so now you say to these people, if you want to be part of this, of Trump world, you've got to sign on to this.
He kind of, he takes away people's escape ramp. And I do think that that makes people more beholden to him, which I also think is part of this.
Tim Miller
Totally agree.
John Lovett
The other piece of this is there are a lot of people thinking very hard around Trump, not Trump, about how he can better use federal power.
I saw a blast from the past phrase the unitary executive theory back from the Bush administration. They also talk about trying to get the president more authority to not spend money Congress has appropriated. Right. This would be for everything from not sending money, the police to not funding social safety net programs. Did any of that come out to you?
Tim Miller
It's not been a good quarter century for the libertarians, I guess.
Terry, executive theory, look, it did.
And I think that, again, when I talk to, there's a hand, like, my old friends don't talk to me anymore because there's the, the betrayal. Obviously, some of the MAGA folks will talk to me, though, and, you know, because they just, whatever, they always saw me as an enemy and they want them as an enemy within. And now I'm an enemy without, in some ways, I'm less threatening. And so when they, I talk to them, this is what they talk about all the time, right? Like that they have had to have learned from the first term, right, that, you know, consolidating power within the executive that there was a lot of deferring. Trump didn't know any better. Trump was, by the way, happy to kind of let Paul Ryan do the legislating. And Mitch McConnell, he had Paul and Mitch, he got to do the fun stuff. They did the dirty work. Right. And the mindset is totally different now.
John Lovett
Couple quick things before we go to break. Are you ready to get into the good, the ad, and the ugly? In the latest episode of political experts react, Dan is joined by MSNBC host Alex Wagner to break down viral political ads from Gavin Newsom, the Biden campaign, and republican voters against Trump to watch this hit series type pod Save America into the nearest YouTube search bar. Also, from Trump's hush money trial to some pivotal Supreme Court hearings, the last few weeks have been a whirlwind. Want to keep up with it all, but have a life we can't relate, but we've got you. Sign up for the what a day newsletter and get a pithy, funny digest of the day's biggest headlines straight to your inbox. Everything you missed and why you should care five days a week, this episode is brought to you by FX is the veil. Starring Elizabeth Moss, FX is the veil is an international spy thriller that follows two women as they play a deadly game of truth and lies on the road from Istanbul to Paris and London. One woman has a secret and the other has a mission to reveal it before thousands of lives are lost. FX is the veil, now streaming only on Hulu.
This show is sponsored by Betterhelp. Is there something you need to get off your chest? What is your outlet for working through the things that stress you out?
You know, I do the crossword. That helps. I'm also, I also go to therapy, you know, and I say this week, I don't want to make any progress. She's like, ugh. That's what she said last week. We all carry around different stressors, big and small. When we keep them bottled up, it can start to affect us negatively. Therapy is a safe space to get things off your chest and to figure out how to work through whatever's weighing you down. If you're thinking of starting therapy, give better help a try. It's entirely online, designed to be convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule. Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist and switch therapist anytime for no additional charge. Get it off your chest with Betterhelp. Visit betterhelp.com PSA today to get 10% off your first month. That's betterhelp help.com PSA Pod Day of.
Boox
America is brought to you by fast growing trees. Did you know fast growing trees is the biggest online nursery in the US with more than 10,000 different kinds of plants and over 2 million happy customers in the US?
John Lovett
I know now, there you go.
Boox
They have everything you could possibly want, like fruit trees, palm trees, evergreens, house plants, and so much more. Whatever you're interested in, they have it for you. Find the perfect fit for your climate and space. Fast growing trees makes it easy to order online, and your plants are shipped directly to your door in one to two days.
John Lovett
And that's, and that's so fast.
Boox
So fast. And along with their 30 day alive and thrive guarantee, they offer free plant consultation forever. Let me tell you, I'm not very good at keeping plants alive, but they sent us a little tree, and it is a ficus. It is both alive and thriving.
John Lovett
Wow. Yeah, wow. Big, beautiful leaves.
Boox
Big leaves. Big leaves. I love the looks of it. Looks great.
It came really fast. Perfect. This spring, they have the best deals online, up to half on select plants and other deals. And listeners to our show get an additional 15% off their first purchase when using the code cricket at checkout. That's an additional 15% off@fastgrowingtrees.com. Using the code cricket at checkout fast growingtrees.com code crooked offers valid for a limited time terms and conditions may apply.
John Lovett
All right. While Trump was apparently dozing off in court, President Biden administration were having a big week. Yesterday, the Associated Press reported that the DEA is taking steps towards reclassifying marijuana. Anonymous sources said that Attorney General Merrick Garland will formally recommend moving marijuana from the schedule one drug to a schedule three drug. That puts it alongside testosterone and tylenol. And Garland's recommendation will trigger the start of a long process.
But given that 70% of Americans support legalization, seems like a great step.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
John Lovett
Is we tight, Tim?
Tim Miller
Yeah, we gonna light it? We know. You know, do a blunt together right now to celebrate.
John Lovett
Yeah.
Tim Miller
Look, man, this has felt like a no brainer from the start and that Joe Biden has been resisting. I don't have any internal, you know, Joe Biden's a teetotaler. Joe Biden's from a different era. Don't know if you noticed that. And so I think that he has been somewhat resistant to this. But, like, it's a political matter. It is fucking obvious. Just based on what has been. Like, look at what happens on ballot initiatives anywhere. I mean, like, in Missouri, they passed a, you know, kind of marijuana decriminalization or, you know, maybe it was medical, but I like, Missouri has moved, like, basically into Alabama territory when it comes to, like, voting for Republicans, you know, and voting for far right republicans in blowout elections. And, like, on the same ballot, they are voting for liberalizing marijuana laws.
So it seems like a no brainer from that perspective as a motivation tool. I do wonder, I guess maybe I'd throw that question back on you. Is it kind of too late?
There was a period in 2015, it'd be like, let's get the youth excited by talking about legalizing marijuana. I don't know that the youth really care about that anymore.
John Lovett
Yes. Well, I think part of the problem is that, well, it depends on where the youth are, right? And also it depends on what this actually does. You know, we just live in this endless morass where when President biden does something, even something good, even something that progressives have been calling on for a while, it takes a long time, and they don't feel the effects right away. Like California.
Tim Miller
Kind of like a weed gummy.
John Lovett
Exactly like a weed gummy. You don't know when it's going to hit. Then all of a sudden you feel pretty good, but it's like 2 hours after you ate it. You almost forget who. You almost forget why. But the. Because, right. Like, in a lot of places, weed is pretend legal. Everyone pretends legal weed is legal in California, even though it is still a schedule one drug.
And then there will be a lot of places where, even if it is reclassified, there won't be recreational weed because it's a state, state question. I remember that I wanted to, I was reflecting on something which is, I think we owe certain old school conservative pundits from the nineties an apology, because I vividly remember Robert Novak.
Robert Novak was a curmudgeonly conservative television pundit. And I remember there was this debate about medical marijuana, and one by one, everyone around the Meet the press table was talking about how it was a good step and it helps people who have illnesses. And yes, you know, weed isn't what it was in the 1960s, and this is supported, blah, blah, blah. And then they get to Robert Novak and he goes, this is the hippies.
This is what the hippies are doing. This is the hippies revenge. They've been trying to get legal marijuana. This is a gateway, and I don't support it. I don't support legal marijuana. I don't support legal drugs, and I don't support the hippies. And I just wanna say that was what was happening. Medical marijuana was a gateway to getting to legal marijuana recreationally. And I think deep down, we all knew that at the time. And you were being gaslit. You're dead now, Robert Novak.
Tim Miller
But nevertheless, you were right about that in Ted. Well, you're wrong on the merits of the policy, but you're right. There's a gateway. There's a similar example to this. I was walking into jazz fest last week, and there were some, you know, some young progressives, you know, kind of multi hair colored look at me and maybe think maybe I could be somebody that could win over on the issue of gay rights.
John Lovett
I don't know.
Tim Miller
I guess I wasn't dressed gay enough that day. And so, like, will you sign this petition to help support the gay agenda? And I was like, whoa. My old instincts came back out. I was like, wait a minute. There's no gay agenda.
The conservatives are always like, the gays have an agenda. Then we're always like, no, what are you talking about? No, we just want equal rights. There's no gay agenda. Turned out there was a gay agenda. Actually, once we got the rights, we were free to talk about it. So marijuana, it was a gateway. And the gays, we did have an agenda, and the nineties republican pundits were right about that.
John Lovett
Yeah, they just, you know, they saw what was coming.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
John Lovett
One other note on this, this was from the AP report, which is, once OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, signs off, the DEA will take public comment on the plan to remove marijuana from its current classification. Following a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services department. After the public comment period and a review by an administrative judge, the agency would eventually publish the rule.
Hey, Tim, make him a Republican.
Maybe we do need Trump's cleansing bureaucratic fire.
Tim Miller
Yeah. I mean, I do think that. I do think we could probably get rid of a few bureaucrats. I do. I do. I maintain that view. I do have to say it. I'm discussing. I have. I'm talking with Josh Shapiro here in a few hours. And one thing I want to ask him, which I'm excited to hear, is, like, you know, I 95 collapses and, like, it's fixed in two days. It's fixed in two days. And I'm like, over in California, they've been trying to build a train for, like, 20 years now. And, like, we spent 100, $800 million, and we haven't even put down any tracks, you know, because we have CEQA. And so, I don't know. Yeah, we could. I think we could get legalized pot and trains and roads that work a little bit faster. Just a little bit faster. We can have a couple of bureaucrats still. I don't want to fire too many people, but I don't know, maybe do less. How about do less bureaucrats?
John Lovett
Well, how about do more faster and cheaper?
Tim Miller
Or do less? Yeah, do less reviews.
John Lovett
I want to do more faster. I want to do more faster and cheaper. I just for the record, okay. I want to. If there is any place where we're faster, it was not to gut the government, 2010 era, Tim Miller style. All right.
Tim Miller
I could be on board with either. I guess I'm saying do less or do more faster. Both of those would be fine than doing more. Much slower, slowly, or.
John Lovett
I do think Biden being out there on marijuana, ultimately, like, I think that put aside the, like, the policy taking time and the fact that, to your point, it does feel like weed has legalized itself, I do think that there's value to having, like, I think for people, people who know that this policy is just completely indefensible. I would like to see President Biden saying that I'm out there trying to do this. And by the way, I've taken steps on behalf of people that have been locked up for nonviolent marijuana offenses. I think that that's all really positive.
Tim Miller
Yeah, we've been joking about this, but it is the criminal justice side of this is serious. Like, you know, weed might be legal in our hearts as, like, rich whites, but like, it has, it has maintained, it is still a problem for people that have less advantages, and there are still people in jail for weed crimes. And so on that side of things, I think that is a good argument to make, and maybe that can be more motivating also to progressives when it's framed that way and less about, like, you know, smoking splits or whatever.
John Lovett
Yeah, I think that's right. I just, I also just. It is like the fact that we have had this quasi legal status for so long is, it is so morally bankrupt that we have people in jail in one place in the same place that we have people walking into a store like it's an Apple store. And the fact that we have tolerated that like it does to me. It's outrageous. And we could talk about ad nauseam. But I do think it speaks to, like, a larger conversation. But, like, how does the society become kind of soft enough that Trump can sneak in? Well, I think part of it is being the kind of place that is willing to overlook those kinds of injustices.
Tim Miller
I'm snapping at you like I'm in the New York Times break room.
John Lovett
Please do. Please do. Speaking of the youth, overnight, a lot of developments in the campus protest movement in New York. NYPD officers in riot gear and riding an armored vehicle moved in on Hamilton hall.
The Zionists have taken back Hamilton hall while protesters had occupied it and barricaded it. Officers also cleared out an encampment at City College. Nearly 300 people were arrested. According to a very satisfied Eric Adams. A lot is happening everywhere. Tulane, Yale, University of Wisconsin. Here in LA, there was an ugly physical altercation between pro palestinian protesters at UCLA who had fortified their encampment with plywood barriers, and a group of what appeared to be pro Israel counter protesters trying to tear down those barriers and throwing things into the encampment. There's disturbing video out there of the two sides fighting. Eventually, the police arrived and separated the groups. Tim, you made a version of this point last night. It is what I think is probably a very popular but quieter sentiment, which is basically the fact that there is a lack of space in this debate for people who are opposed to the war, believe the Palestinians deserve freedom and self determination, opposed to perpetuating a famine murdering civilians, opposed to the anti semitism and islamophobia around these protests, and opposed, and this is a quote of yours, opposed to militarized police marching on the Portlandia quad like they're invading Fallujah.
What that. And it was, I was glad to see you had a back and forth with Mehdi Hansen, who we had on love or leave it last week. And the fact that I think that there was so much comedy between the two of you, I think speaks to the fact that there really hasn't been that space during this moment, in part because I think Republicans don't want it to be. They want to talk about the chaos. They want to exploit this. But I also think the media owns this. I think Democrats own this and the students themselves, by the way, who have agency and ought to be held responsible for their words and their actions. But how do we make space for that kind of a dialogue, which is, I think, clearly what's needed.
Tim Miller
Yeah, we're doing it right now, so here we are. Yeah. Look, I think that there are a lot of people that are afraid to say what they really think about this. And I just, I have to tell you, like, we just did this talking about MAga and talking about the Trump administration, how they're trying to create a world. And I came from a world where a lot of my former friends have real thoughts about Trump that they will tell me after a couple of beers or that they used to and that they won't say out loud, they won't say on Twitter. And I feel like that there are a lot of people that have the views about this conflict and these protests, and there's, and I think that we need to make it okay for people to express their views without immediately going to ad hominem and, you know, saying, oh, that means you're on bb side. That means you're on the terrorist side. Like when it comes to BB and when it comes to Hamas, I think about, are you ever on Reddit?
John Lovett
You know, the, from time to time.
Tim Miller
You know, the am I the asshole? Reddit feed?
John Lovett
Yes.
Tim Miller
Right. So on the am I the asshole? Somebody writes, you know, a story and tell about how they've been a jerk to their colleague or something, and then the responders can say either you're an asshole or you're not an asshole. But there are some situations where the commenters respond, esh, everybody sucks here. And like, that's how I feel about the Hamas Bibi situation. Like, everybody sucks here. Okay? Like obviously not the innocent people that have been killed or that, whether they were in a kibbutz or whether they're in Gaza. But when it comes to the leadership of Israel, pretty much everybody sucks here. When it comes to Hamas, who is still holding hostages and still using their own people as human shields. Everybody sucks here. And unfortunately, I feel that way a little bit about the Columbia situation where I think there are many protesters who are very earnest in their protest against the war. And I think Medi, and this was part of me and Mehdi's exchange yesterday where Meddy's like, well, Tim, the reason why they're not protesting Hamas is because we're not giving weapons to Hamas and they're only protesting Israel because that's, you know, where we have some, you know, control in our democratic government. And I'm like, okay, I guess that's fine, but it'd be nice to have if the protests also included some people with signs that said, by the way, Hamas sucks, too. And unfortunately, what I see in those protests are a couple people that have, like, Hezbollah flags or a couple people that are like, jews should go back to Europe or America where they came from, which is just ahistorical or glory to our martyrs.
All that stuff makes me uncomfortable, and that's not to impugn everybody that has very real earnest concerns about the humanitarian crisis. But I would like to see a little bit more, you know, if the goal of these protests is, hey, we need a ceasefire, then we should also at least be expressing that we're pretty upset about the main party that's preventing us from a cease fire right now, which is Hamas.
And so anyway, that's why I'm kind of like, everybody sucks here when it comes to those protests. Also. And also the cops, which was. And Eric Adams, which is way overkill. And it's only in America and third world countries. Like, there's. This is not happening in Germany or in Sweden if they're. If they're protests, you know, it's very nice. Officers with little. Little batons, like, asking people to move off the property. Like, the idea they have these fucking face masks. Like, it's all. It's crazy.
John Lovett
Yeah, there's a. There is somebody. This is not my observation, but somebody pointed out that you can track the evolution of our militarization of police by looking at the way the Lego policeman has changed over the years from like a smiling kind of almost in a postal uniform to basically now, like, a soldier. Yeah, no, I agree with what you're saying. I also.
I do think that, like, one of the ways our brains are all collectively pickled from years of political coverage that treats everyone like a pundit is we kind of bounce back and forth almost without noticing between what is sort of morally righteous versus what. What is effective and now, I have the thing in both, right? You are correct. It is both, I think, less effective and I think less, I think, morally defensible to not make denouncing Hamas holding of hostage a part of what you're trying to protest. But then sometimes I also think, just. Okay, I don't agree with a lot of what these protesters are saying. I'm sure I would find them quite annoying. Right. However, they have successfully drawn attention to what is the urgent moral crisis half a world away, where children and civilians are being killed, where there seems to be no end in sight to this conflict, even as a ceasefire is being negotiated. And then I think, well, you know what? It doesn't really matter that I disagree with what these protesters are saying on the larger issue or the fact that I find the ramifications of their views abhorrent, because what it would actually mean to achieve what they claim to be their goals, I find it abhorrent because what they are actually protesting right now is something that I completely agree with, which is the inhumane and despicable conduct of this war. And I don't want to be a person who makes the same mistake that a lot of people make when they look at a protest, which is get sucked into a debate over its tactics and methods, rather than putting aside the longer term problems with the BDS movement or the ways in which I disagree with it, but rather, what are they drawing attention to and are they right to do it?
Tim Miller
Yeah, I. With that. I get it. I think about that for sure.
And maybe you could argue there's been some success there. The fact that there's some more food trucks are getting in. You know, would that have happened without the. I don't know. Would that have happened without the protests? You know, it's hard to do that. Counterfactual. I will say this, though. There's just not another situation for a group besides Jews where it would be acceptable in polite liberal society to, like, hold a protest where people are just. Where they're members of the protest that are dehumanizing and personally attacking people from a specific religious or ethnic group. Like, it's hard to imagine that being acceptable in liberal society for targeting any group except for Jews. And so I just, like, there feels like there should be a way. There's not. It's a protest, right? There are going to be a lot of people out there. You can. You can nut pick one sign. Like, sure. Like, there's no way to totally control every protester sign or chant. And there have been some gross chants from the pro jewish counter protesters, by the way. But, like, if at a broad enough level, there's a certain group that doesn't feel safe and they feel like they're being attacked, like there would be more widespread condemnation about that if I think if that's other groups. And I think that's been, that's been, that's upset a lot of jewish people and a lot of, you know, people that are allies of jewish folks and or just observers of this situation.
John Lovett
I agree. I agree with that. And, you know, and now the response is, right. Well, there are also jewish students who are part of these protests. But sure, I think that the issue. Right. Is like, why, right. Why, why does this happen? Right. Why does this, why does there even if, even if most of the protesters, while saying things that I think ultimately would resort into a cataclysm for millions of jewish people in Israel, they are not shouting anti semitic statements, they are not shouting slurs, but they're, but, but people that do do that are drawn to the outskirts or are inside of these protests. We saw one of the leaders in Colombia, which has also gotten an absurd amount of attention, but nevertheless, saying horrible things, came to attention. Shocking that that person is still was walking around until it drew national embarrassment for the school.
But I do think that that's a question, right? Why does this draw this kind of anti Semitism? And I think it is because this line between anti Zionism and anti semitism is a hard one to draw. And I see it myself, where you see this word Zionist being thrown at people in a way that it does get my back up because it's so quick to be thrown as a slur.
And so I just, in the end, I just, like, this is really fucking hard.
Tim Miller
Yeah, it's a liberal Zionist. It's a liberal Zionist. Look, I have a lot of friends like this that are in Israel, that are liberal Zionists that were in the streets protesting Bibi, that believe Israel has a right to exist, that love Tel Aviv as just a beautiful city, that's a very gay city, by the way, and really diverse city and like, and have moved there and love being there. And they protested Bibi. They do not like the Likud government, but they believe Israel has a right to exist. And they dress visibly jewish and, you know, they have the star David necklace or whatever, and they're, they're being treated like shit by their friends, like on social media and by some of these protesters. They're being treated terribly. And so, yeah, sure, they're anti zionist Jews that are part of the protests. But, like, that group, they didn't do anything wrong. Like, they're not bombing Hamas. Their friends or relatives or acquaintances got killed by Hamas. Right? And all they're trying to say is, we have a right to exist, too, and we want to have a right to exist peacefully, and we want the Palestinians to be able to get aid. Like, those people aren't doing anything wrong, and they're, they're being treated very poorly by the protesters. Is that the acute problem, like, as compared, is there, are their feelings as important as the dead palestinian kids? Of course not. That's why you always have to caveat. That's why you have this conversation every time you say that. Yeah, yeah. Everyone sucks here.
Everyone. A lot of people are getting screwed here. But it's worth saying, though, I think.
John Lovett
It'S worth saying for another reason, which, forget us. Forget the, like, tone policing in addition to the baton policing that's going on.
I think it matters not just because of how it makes people feel, but my sincere view, which I've expressed many times in various forms on this and other podcasts, is that the most effective way that advocating, chanting from the river to the sea, making it this manichean struggle between colonialists and anti colonialists, none of it puts actual peace for actual human beings closer. And actually, I think if it is effective, it puts those things farther away, because there is no answer to this problem that involves ratifying those kinds of ideas that they are is far from it. And that, to me, I do think is important, and not just because I don't like what they're saying, and I don't like how it makes people feel. How Americans currently feel is not the most important thing. I think it is because the larger struggle, that peace in this larger struggle requires rejecting those kinds of ideas.
Tim Miller
Yeah, you just have me on. You just want to just peel away the onion and just, you know, find. You're like, I want to bring up tariffs. I want to. I want to dunk on progressive protesters. Like, let's talk about student.
John Lovett
Every time I'm trying to characterize it that way. You're trying to characterize it that way.
Tim Miller
You're doing it for.
John Lovett
You're.
Tim Miller
It's intentional. I get it. That's fine. I'm happy to do it. I'm happy to be your little, I don't know, token.
John Lovett
Okay.
D
Your new beginning starts now. Doctor Horton has new construction homes available in Ellensburg and throughout the greater Seattle area. With spacious floor plans, flexible living spaces, and smart home technology, you can enjoy more cozy moments and sweet memories in your beautiful new home. With new home communities opening in Ellensburg and throughout the Seattle area, Doctor Horton has the ideal home for you. Learn more at Dr. Horton.com dot. Dr. Horton, America's builder and equal housing opportunity builder.
John Lovett
One last crass political question about this situation, which is Republicans like this. They like the chaos. They like trying to drive a wedge between Democrats and their jewish constituency. How were you about it and what would you do about it?
Tim Miller
Many constituencies, not just the jewish constituency, youth, Arab, just broadly, people of color. I think there's a lot of folks that have genuine unhappiness and concerns situation. It's a wedge. So, yeah, look, I think that the Republicans do see this as a political opportunity. They do not see any, with maybe the exception of, like, the one or two random libertarians who are in there. Our friend Justin Mosh is gone, so maybe there aren't any good ones left. You know, they don't mind seeing the cops with their batons, you know, going in there and knocking some heads.
They think that's a winner for them.
Donald Trump wants, I think, bleeded and the protests now, like, there is no nuance here. You know, Jared Kushner is talking about, you know, building, building mar a Lago, you know, on the strip in Gaza. So I think it's a winner across the board. They might be right.
And I think that it's concerning.
It is concerning if there are young voter, Joe Biden has a very fragile coalition, which includes people that are quite Israel sympathetic in the democratic coalition, but also kind of the swing voters who left the Republican Party over Trump that are not happy with him. The young voters are in his coalition. Dearborn voters are in his coalition.
He has to navigate a, a very broad and wide coalition that has very different views on this. Republicans are happy to take advantage of it. Meanwhile, Donald Trump's coalition is like, mostly either pro Israel or totally anti semitic. So it's a little bit less, it's like less of a tightrope.
John Lovett
Speaker one. Yeah, well, that's. It is.
But it's interesting that it is less of a tightrope because of what you just said. But I do think what I was getting at, right, is that, yes, this is an issue that what is happening in Gaza is potentially alienating key constituents. Biden needs, like arab voters and young voters, while at the same time the Republicans are trying to exploit the protests without really regard for the views of those young people or those arab voters in Dearborn. They're trying to go for, they're trying to kind of use the chaos. They're trying to say that jews are unsafe. Right. They're trying to go after that constituency specifically, for sure.
Tim Miller
Yeah. And I think it's working.
It's alarming to me. But anecdotally speaking, you know, this is this 1%, is this 2%. I don't want to overstate how big of the audience this is. It's a pretty small demographic. But it could be important in Atlanta, could be important in Philly, which is, you know, Wall Street Journal reading conservatives who are either jewish or, you know, kind of have strong foreign policy hawks that were turned off by Trump because of his dabbling in anti semitism and because of his, you know, isolationism that you hear them saying anecdotally like that. I don't know. I don't like what's happening. Trump will defend us. You know, maybe I have to go back to Trump. You know, there's a whole Dan Senor, you know, who works for Paul Singer, who used to be a never Trumper, who is a big donor, who went back to Trump. Paul Singer's already back at Trump. Seems like Dan is sympathetic to that. You see this.
And I was actually just with someone today who said that they're friend who's Jewish, who said that their friends, they have friends that feel this way. So is that going to change by November? Will cooler heads prevail? Hopefully. But I do think that there is a small demo of group voters that were traditionally republican that were gettable for Biden that are, you know, that are starting to lean back towards Trump over this. I find that asinine. Just to be clear, I find that asinite and insane that you would, that on the issue of anti semitism, you would go back to the person that had lunch with Nick Fuentes and Kanye. I found it ludicrous and the extreme, but that doesn't mean that it's not happening.
John Lovett
So Biden, there are also people trying to lay what's happening on a campus in New York, on a private university campus, at Biden's feet, I think, often in bad faith. But nevertheless, Biden has a difficult square to circle here. He needs to assuage the concerns of that part of his coalition that is concerned about these protests and worried about antisemitism has to assuage the concerns of people that are deeply unhappy with his policy in Gaza. That requires a policy change that requires something to actually shift on the ground. For sure. But what would you like to see Biden say if there's anything he's not saying, man.
Tim Miller
And this is going to be a very untimed thing. Uh, this is on the pod bro podcast. It should be you guys saying this, but we could really use Obama on this because it's so. No, he was really good at this stuff, like, going out there and talking. And this was his whole bit, the starting in zero four. Like, there are red states and there are blue states. We can be. We can think about the. We can be empathetic towards the other side while also understanding the policy ramifications. He was talented at this. Biden's like, that's not his strength, man. Like, he's got strengths, but, like, that's not it. And I think that right now, there are people that are like, where is on this? And a lot of what they've been doing has been relegated to written statements, which are usually pretty good, by the way, if you read the Biden administrator, White House's written statements, they usually are very empathetic, very nuanced, very thoughtful, but they're not letting him loose on it, and maybe for good reason. I think that it's really. It's dicey, but I do think that he needs to speak out more. And you could speak out from first principles. And the nice thing about having a speech, not a press conference, is you could speak more just about the thing. Like, you can be the inverse of my original statement where we started this. Everything's an asshole. You can be the positive version of that, which is, I'm worried about Gaza. We're trying to get food in. I'm worried about anti semitism on campuses in America.
We should have that stopped. I'm worried about free speech rights. Kids shouldn't be getting knocked over by police officers when they're at. You know, he could do that, but there's gonna be people he doesn't please. If he does it. But it's probably.
We'll see if it doesn't get any better. It's gonna be something he's gonna have to figure out how to do.
John Lovett
Yeah, I think that's right. I do think that in moments like this, when the rhetoric is heated, when people are talking past each other, and when Republicans are trying to exploit it for the chaos, I do think sometimes that does lower the bar a little bit and turns just stating first principles, sort of where we started this conversation into something that I think is calming and relieving and actually goes a long way. Before we let you go, Tim, Vice President Kamala Harris went on Drew Barrymore show on Monday. Talked about a wide range of topics.
But this moment, I don't think you've seen it. And I think we'd like to get your live reaction.
Tim Miller
I've not.
John Lovett
I've been thinking that we really all need a tremendous hug in the world right now, but in our country, we need you to be Mamala of the country.
Yeah. I mean, yeah.
It made me very uncomfortable. It made me very uncomfortable.
Tim Miller
It made kabbalah very uncomfortable.
John Lovett
I know.
Tim Miller
I like that.
John Lovett
I like that. She's like, what is going on?
Tim Miller
Is she about to touch me?
John Lovett
Everybody. We don't need any politician to be mom. We don't need to be Mamala. We don't be daddy. We don't need a national dad. We don't need any of that shit. It's a. It's a. It's a city where they go to write laws and regulations and to implement policies that affect our lives. They're not dad, they're not mom.
I hate that shit.
Tim Miller
Me too. We need a head of government, by the way. This was like, this is fundamentally american. Love it. Where you're getting at. Like, this is John Adams. Like, John Adams wanted to name the president his excellency or some shit. And George Washington was like, fuck that. Mister president.
Mister president. We could have a misses president. Hopefully soon. That's it. They're one of us. They're of the people. We do not need a mom. We, they are not like the royal family. They don't need to be anything special. That does bother that I'm with you on that. Also the touching.
John Lovett
Also the touching because you had a moment where Carrie Lake touched you during.
Tim Miller
It was kind of.
John Lovett
You didn't like her. It was kind of similar.
Tim Miller
She. I don't mind if you touch me on the shoulders. I don't know. I mean, Drew is kind of the good angel version of Carrie. It's like the same energy, but like the light versus the darkness kind of with Carrie or Drew. But they both did the double hand thing. Yeah.
You can touch me on my shoulder. We can hug. But there's something about the four, like eight fingers.
John Lovett
Remember when George W. Bush lost himself for a second and tried to give Angela Merkel a shoulder rub?
Truly was just like he miscategorized.
He just did something he might do to a relative or a loved one, but he just kind of, as he was passing, gave her a quick. And she shivered like I've never seen a person shiver. The other piece of this, too is politics is emotional because it's serious. And the stakes are very, very high. But we actually don't need these figures to assuage.
It's actually the mirror of the people. People who say, like, oh, they don't find Joe Biden inspiring. Okay, I get wanting Joe Biden to inspire other people, because you want politics to have outcomes, but you don't need to be inspired, because if you say, I want to be inspired, it's a little bit like, I don't know, like, Louis XIV being like, bring me a show. I'd like to see something. Bring me a. Bring me a lovely cake and a show. It's like, that's not what this is about. Like, if you're feeling worried and anxious about politics, it's not Kamala Harris's job to assuage you. It might be valuable for others, but if it's for you, sort of should be an embarrassing thing to request.
Tim Miller
Yeah, go volunteer. If you want to be inspired, you know, go out in society and find somebody inspiring. That's not what the. Let, you know, the head legislator of the country, necessarily. It's nice. It's a nice bonus, you know, if you get a little tingle up your leg when the president talks, like, that's not. That should be a bonus, you know, a little cherry on top. That's not the median requirement.
John Lovett
Yeah. The idea that, like, and I get where it's just a very, like, I don't know, it's just a very Hollywood, oh, the country needs a hug right now. The country doesn't need a hug.
Tim Miller
That's one of those.
John Lovett
People need hugs from their loved ones in their own private lives. The country needs effective governance and to defeat a despicable authoritarian movement. That's what the country needs. Hugs after.
Tim Miller
Go watch finding full restor. That's nice. You know, go find a. Watch a movie about a young man overcoming challenges. You know, whatever. Find. Go find something. That's fine. You don't need a mom from Kamala.
We're very aligned on this.
John Lovett
John Lovett, we're, look, you and I, you began peanut butter and jelly.
Tim Miller, you know him from the bulwark.
Send all your negative comments at him.
As always, great to see you, Tim. And that's great.
Tim Miller
And if you're the one person out there that agreed with all my takes today, the bulwark plus is available on Substack because I spent an hour for you. All right, see you, John. I miss you.
John Lovett
And if Tim isn't your cup of tea, don't worry. Dan and John back Friday morning.
Tim Miller
Peace.
Boox
If you want to get ad free episodes, exclusive content and more. Consider joining our friends of the Pod subscription community@Crooked.com friends and if you're already doom scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more. Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review. Pod Save America America is a crooked media production. Our show is produced by Olivia Martinez and David Toledo. Our associate producers are Sol Rubin and Farah Safari. Kira Joachim is our senior producer. Reed Shurlin is our executive producer. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Kanter is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis writing support by Hallie Kiefer. Madeline Heringer is our head of news and programming. Matt de Grote is our head of production, Andy Taft as our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Hailey Jones, Mia Kellman, David Tols, Kirill Pallaviv and Molly lobel.
D
Your new beginning starts now. Doctor Horton has new construction homes available in Ellensburg and throughout the greater Seattle area. With spacious floor plans, flexible living spaces and smart home technology, you can enjoy more cozy moments and sweet memories in your beautiful, beautiful new home. With new home communities opening in Ellensburg and throughout the Seattle area, Dr. Horton has the ideal home for you. Learn more@drhorton.com. Dr. Horton, America's builder and equal housing opportunity builder.