Dad's microbiome can affect offsprings' health - in mice

This episode explores groundbreaking research on how alterations in a father’s gut microbiome can influence the health of offspring, as demonstrated in mice.

1. Disruption of a father’s gut microbiome can negatively impact offspring health, evidenced by reduced birth weight and developmental issues.
2. The effects are linked to changes in sperm, not directly transmitted through genetic mutations but possibly through epigenetic alterations.
3. Recovery of the gut microbiome in fathers can reverse the adverse effects on offspring, suggesting the potential for preventive interventions.
4. This research underscores the importance of environmental factors in reproductive health and intergenerational disease transmission.
5. The findings may have significant implications for understanding human health, although direct correlations to humans remain to be established.

1: Introduction

Overview of the episode's theme on the impact of the gut microbiome on health. Benjamin Thompson: "This week, uncovering why cancer rates vary worldwide and how altering the gut microbiome could affect reproduction."

2: Study Discussion

Discussion on the research methodology and findings. Jamie Hackett: "The initial way we chose to disrupt the microbiota was by using non-absorbable antibiotics administered at a fairly low dose."

3: Implications and Future Research

Exploration of the broader implications of the study and future research directions. Lisa Verus: "I was incredibly impressed how almost beyond the scope of this paper, the authors went to try and pinpoint what is happening."

1. Consider Diet and Environment: Pay attention to dietary and environmental factors that may influence gut health, as they could have far-reaching effects on future generations.
2. Seek Regular Health Screenings: Regular health check-ups can help monitor changes that might affect microbiome health.
3. Limit Antibiotic Use: Avoid unnecessary antibiotics to maintain a balanced gut microbiome, unless prescribed by a healthcare professional.
4. Explore Probiotics: Consider incorporating probiotics into your diet to support a healthy gut microbiome.
5. Stay Informed: Keep up with the latest research on gut health and its potential impacts on reproductive and overall health.

The risk of developing cancer can vary hugely depending on geographic region, but it’s not exactly clear why. To get a better idea, a team has compared the genomes of kidney cancers taken from people around the globe. They reveal a link between geographical locations and specific genetic mutations, suggesting that there are as-yet unknown environmental or chemical exposures in different locations. They hope this work will inform public health efforts to identify and reduce potential causes of cancer.

People

Benjamin Thompson, Jamie Hackett, Lisa Verus

Companies

European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Rutgers University

Books

None

Guest Name(s):

Jamie Hackett

Content Warnings:

None

Deep dive into the world of science with nature
Deep dive into the world of science with nature. Plus, from the vastness of the distant star systems to the intricacies of infectious diseases due to climate change, weve got you covered. Enjoy access to over 55 cutting edge journals, breaking scientific news, and over 1000 new articles every month. Whether youre a seasoned researcher or just curious, NaturePlus simplifies complex studies plus its all available right at your fingertips on nature.com nature plus, the key to unlocking the world's most significant scientific advances. Subscribe today at go dot nature.com plus.

The Mamas bonus moms office moms moms of moms
The Mamas bonus moms office moms moms of moms this Mother's day give back to the ones that have given us so much 1800 flowers helps you celebrate all your amazing moms with handmade bouquets, sweet treats, gourmet food and one of a kind gifts ordered easily and delivered fresh for a limited time. You can save up to 40% off Mother's Day bestsellers at 1800 flowers.com acast don't wait. Order today and save up to 40% at one eight hundredflowers.com acast.

Featured in
Featured in.

The next we don't know yet why
The next we don't know yet why.

Is blight so far?
Is blight so far?

Featured in
Bly? It sounds so simple, they had no idea.

The next we don't know yet why
But now the data.

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
I find this not only refreshing refreshing.

But at some level, astounding
But at some level, astounding.

The next we don't know yet why
Nature.

Is blight so far?
Welcome back to the Nature podcast this week, uncovering why cancer rates vary so much worldwide and how altering the.

The next we don't know yet why
Gut microbiome could affect reproduction. I'm Benjamin Thompson.

Is blight so far?
And I'm Nick Petra Chow.

Where you live can have a big impact on your risk of getting cancer. People in Malawi, for instance, have a much higher risk of esophageal cancer, even in comparison to neighbouring countries.

In fact, even if you move from one place to another, you take on the risk of your new home.

Now, some of this global variation is down to known factors, like using wood burning stoves or rates of smoking, but that only explains some of the differences.

There's a lot scientists don't really know about why where you live affects the risk of cancer.

Now a study in nature is providing new clues by looking across the world at genomes from the most common type of kidney cancer, clear cell carcinoma.

I called up one of the authors behind the new work, Paul Brennan. And on a slightly wobbly phone line he explained some of the regions that have particularly high levels of clear cell.

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
Carcinoma in central Europe, the Czech Republic traditionally had a very high incidence of this cancer. Other countries that have very high rate include countries like Hungary, the baltic countries, and we can't explain why this is. It's not explained by factors such as tobacco, obesity, hypertension.

Is blight so far?
So what was your approach, then, in this study? To try and solve the problem and understand why there is such variation?

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
Been trying to do in this study is really to take quite a different approach to the traditional epidemiological type study, and it's to try and see if we can get the answer of why there is a high infants in some populations and not in others, by looking in the tumor genomes and the patterns of mutations in the genomes. Because more recently, over the last ten years or so, with whole genome sequencing of large numbers of cancers, it's become clear that specific causes of cancer often leave a specific pattern of mutations in the genome. So tobacco smoking in lung cancer, for example, tends to leave a very specific pattern of mutations. So we were hoping that by looking at the patterns of mutations in the genomes of individuals with this cancer between high and low risk countries, we might see differences in the mutation patterns that might lead us to understanding what the underlying causes might be.

Is blight so far?
So it's almost like working back. You start with the cancer, then look at the mutations underlying that cancer and then see what could have caused that.

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
Exactly.

Is blight so far?
And so this was a huge study. It was eleven countries on four continents that you had these cancer genomes from. What did you find by looking at the sort of differences between them?

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
So, for example, we found in Japan a signature called signature twelve. It previously been reported, and this was present in about three quarters of the cases in Japan and was almost completely absent elsewhere.

So the signature has some of the characteristics of signatures that are called by external agents, and we have no idea what it is. But this is pointing towards an exposure in the japanese populations.

Is blight so far?
Do you think, then, this study will inform japanese health authorities to try and investigate what's going on here?

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
Well, I think it's certainly going to lead to further study to try and understand what's underlying this, because we don't know if it's an environmental type agent, if it's something in the food supply or some other lifestyle type habit that's resulting these mutations. We don't know to what extent it's restricted to Japan, because all of our cadence in this region were from Japan, or to what extent it might be affecting countries in the east asian region. So we don't know if it's affecting millions or tens of millions of people, or potentially even hundreds of millions of people.

Is blight so far?
Is it possible that this could be something to do with the genetics of the population in Japan? Or are you pretty certain this is coming from, as you say, like an external agent, some sort of environmental factor.

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
We certainly tried to rule out that this was due to some genetic difference of the japanese population, and we did not find any genetic variant that was associated with this. We looked at some known type genes, metabolite type genes that are common in the japanese population. We found no association with any of these. So to the extent that we could, we ruled out that explanation and another.

Is blight so far?
Signature that seemed to crop up in quite a lot of the cases that you looked at, this signature, 40, what do you think was the significance of this particular mutation?

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
This is a new signature. In fact, we call it 40 b.

And the interesting thing about this signature was that it was far higher in the high incidence countries. We found evidence of it in every country, but it was a lot higher in the heightened countries, in particular in countries like Czech Republic, in Lithuania.

This is the hallmark of something that could explain the geographical difference in renal cancer.

So a clear challenge now is to try and pinpoint what is underlying this signature, assume that it is some type of environmental agent, because that could really be the secret to understanding why renal cancer is so high in some countries and not in others.

Is blight so far?
From the discussion we've had, it seems like there are still a lot of unknowns here. But what do you hope this work will be used for in the future?

I find this not only refreshing refreshing
I think currently it's showing that its approach to sequencing cancers and sequencing tissue across different populations is providing evidence for exposures that are causing mutations in large numbers of specific populations. So this is providing a whole new angle on potential carcinogens and mutagens that traditional epidemiological studies have not been providing. So I think we need to consider to what extent we should be doing this sort of study on a far larger scale. We included eleven countries here. We found evidence for widespread mutagens across these eleven countries. So question we're asking is, what would happen if we looked at this in 50 or 60 countries? So if we looked at this really on a global level, would we find evidence for a whole range of other mutagens that. That were existing in populations that, you know, we just don't know about at the moment. And then the second thing is, how do you go back to the populations and identify what the underlying exposure might be and what the source of the exposure is? And that will require a whole different type of study that would really obtain detailed information on individuals to try and trade where the exposure was coming from. If we could do that, then that could potentially lead to cancer prevention.

Is blight so far?
That was Paul Brennan from the International Agency for Research on Cancer in France. For more on that study, check out the show notes for some links.

The next we don't know yet why
Coming up, evidence that upsetting the gut microbiome in male mice could affect their reproductive organs.

Right now, though, it's the research highlights with dan Fox.

Dan Fox
Saber toothed cats and the direwolf are two examples of enormous extinct creatures with huge teeth. But have you heard of the saber toothed salmon?

This salmon ancestor reached 2.7 meters long as it swam in the northwest Pacific some 5 million years ago.

Previous work had indicated that the salmon had saber like fangs. But now researchers have done imaging scans on fossils, which still had their teeth attached, that suggest the fangs were really sideways facing tusks, like those of a warthog.

The snout mounted spikes were not for hunting prey. The massive fish are thought to have dined on plankton, but the oversized tusks might have been used for self defense, intraspecies competition, or digging out nests in the riverbed.

Get your tusks into that research in PLoS one, a common fungus, has been found to simultaneously remove heavy metals and organic pollutants from its surroundings.

Aspergillus niger was already known to take up heavy metals from contaminated soil in a process called bioremediation. But toxic metals are often found in the environment, together with carbon based organic pollutants like insect repellent.

To test how organic pollutants might affect heavy metal bioremediation, research has exposed the fungus to toxic metals along with an organic dye. They found that the presence of both pollutants actually enhanced the uptake of metals and degradation of the dye. The results suggest that aspergillus niger or similar fungi might be useful for cleaning soil and water tainted by complex mixtures of contaminants.

You can soak up that paper in current biology.

The next we don't know yet why
Our bodies are teeming with microorganisms.

But these microbes aren't just functionless passengers traveling in and on a human vessel.

Many of them appear to play important roles in how our bodies operate, especially those that live in the gut.

Disruption of the gut microbiota has been linked to issues with organs like the liver, kidney, and brain. But Jamie Hackett from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and his colleagues wanted to know whether another set of organs should be added to the list, the reproductive organs. They were also interested in whether any disruptions could even have effects on future offspring.

Here's Jamie the idea that the environment.

But at some level, astounding
Of a parent prior to conception may influence the phenotype or even the disease risk in offspring is something that's really kind of captured people's imagination over the last decade or so. It's a really interesting idea. At the same time, I think there's been quite a lot of healthy skepticism about whether this is actually happening in a meaningful way in mammals.

The next we don't know yet why
And this is something that Jamie and the team have tried to shed a light on, and they've published a paper about it in this week's nature. In particular, they looked at how disrupting the gut microbiomes in male mice prior to conception could affect their progeny.

But at some level, astounding
The initial way we chose to disrupt the microbiota was by using non absorbable antibiotics administered at a fairly low dose. So we're not trying to ablate the microbiome here, we're just trying to perturb it.

The next we don't know yet why
By using antibiotics that aren't absorbed by the body and only stay in the guts, the team could be confident that any effects they saw were down to disruption of the microbes living there.

Mice that had their gut microbes disrupted were otherwise healthy. But when these males were mated with untreated female mice, this wasn't the case for some of their offspring. On average, these pups had a reduced birth weight, but some had more significant issues.

But at some level, astounding
What we began to see is that a fraction of these mice, they were severely underweight. We saw quite a severe growth restriction, and ultimately many of those mice were not able to survive. And we just didn't see that when the fathers had, let's say, an unperturbed microbiome, and it was in the range of 10% of the offspring. This is not a deterministic thing whereby if you perturb a prospective father's microbiome, there's going to be an effect. It's more that you're changing the risk of an adverse pregnancy or disease risk in the offspring.

The next we don't know yet why
But this could be reversed. Stopping antibiotics allowed the gut microbes of the treated mice to recover when they subsequently went on to have more offspring. This increased risk of health issues wasn't seen strongly, hinting that these microbes were central to the phenomenon.

But it was possible that this effect could have been caused by the mice passing on their dysfunctional gut microbiome to female mice or their offspring through contact. Perhaps to rule this out, the team turned to in vitro fertilization.

But at some level, astounding
In those circumstances, there's no parental contact whatsoever. We just use donor sperm and donor oocytes. And again, we saw that when the sperm is derived from a father with a microbiome percolation, the offspring are born with an increased risk of severe growth restriction.

The next we don't know yet why
But how was the microbiome affecting the male mice's reproductive organs? Well, the team showed that there were physical changes in the mouse testes. They were smaller, for example, but there were also changes in levels of metabolites and hormones known to be important in sperm production.

The sperm themselves were also affected. The team didn't find any changes in their genomes, but they did find other changes, like alterations in levels of molecules that potentially influence how genes are switched on and off.

Exactly what these changes are doing is unknown, but they appear to be having an effect post fertilization.

But at some level, astounding
If you look during mid gestation, there aren't a lot of changes in the embryo itself, but there are clear changes in the placenta. What this was implying is that the status of microbiome perturbation in the father at the time of conception was influencing placental development, which means the placenta is unable to function appropriately. And we suspect this is what's actually causing the slightly lower birth weight and the increased risk for severe developmental events in offspring.

The next we don't know yet why
So whatever these changes to the sperm are specifically doing, they can have an impact on placental development. But it's not clear why.

And the team have shown evidence that all this can be traced back to disruptions to the population of microbes living in the guts of male mice.

Lisa Verus from Rutgers University researches the effects the microbiome can have on health. She's co written a news and views article for Nature and says she's convinced by the huge amount of data the team present.

Featured in
I was incredibly impressed how almost beyond the scope of this paper, the authors went to try and pinpoint what is happening. How they looked at sperm quality, how they looked at placental health, how they measured the health of offspring, how many different microbiome experiments they carried out to show that this effect is not because of the transfer of the microbiome itself, but through the indirect effects. So they really included so many state of the art experiments. I was incredibly impressed.

The next we don't know yet why
However, there's still some big unresolved questions. Why is this happening? And why doesn't it happen every time?

After all, it's only a fraction of the mouse offspring that experienced the severe growth impairments.

To understand it, Lisa thinks that researchers need to look at what happens in the gut when antibiotics are administered.

Featured in
Because we can think of microbiome as a jungle of its own, right? And when we give it antibiotics, it's almost like a forest fire. Some strains survive, some don't, some increase in abundance. Their gene expression and the way they live in the gut changes. So I think looking at the bacterial gene expression, really trying to delve more into the bacterial side, not the host side, can also give us indication of what could actually participate in signaling in the reproductive tissue.

The next we don't know yet why
There's also the question of whether the results in this paper translate into humans. Jamie cautions that it's currently impossible to know, and that there are likely many interconnecting and overlapping pathways to uncover. Both he and Lisa also stress that antibiotics remain a vital medicine and that this work shouldn't put people off using them.

But even if this work doesn't show exactly how this intergenerational disease risk is transmitted, it adds more evidence to the idea that heritability is about more than just the genes encoded in DNA at present.

But at some level, astounding
I think it's interesting from a biological point of view. It tells you that in the case of these mice, lifelong disease risk, or phenotype more generally, is not purely dependent on the genes you inherit, but there is some component of parental environment that is having, albeit a relatively small effect, a effect on phenotype. So that, conceptually is really interesting. It also tells us that we need to consider, perhaps a little bit more how the environments that we're exposed to is affecting mammalian physiology all the way through, from the molecular responses within the organism to a much bigger scale, which is intergenerational effects.

The next we don't know yet why
That was Jamie Hackett from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Italy and Lisa Verus from Rutgers University in the US to read Jamie's paper and Lisa's news and views article. Look for links in the show notes.

Is blight so far?
Finally on the show, it's time for the briefing chat, where we discuss a couple of articles from the nature briefing. Ben, what have you been reading this week?

The next we don't know yet why
Well, I've got a story from nature, and it's about an atlas. Okay. And it's not about any old atlas. It's an atlas of the moon. And in fact, it's the highest resolution one yet.

Is blight so far?
So when you say an atlas of the moon, is this just like, you know, where all the craters are or that sort of thing, or is it, you know, more in depth detail about what the moon's composed of? What makes up a moon atlas?

The next we don't know yet why
Well, a bit of both, actually. So this was released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Right? And it's taken 100 researchers over a decade to compile. Yeah, and it reveals 12,341 craters, 81 basins, 17 rock types, and lots of other sort of geological info about the moon's surface.

Is blight so far?
So the moon has a lot of craters and rocks. Were scientists surprised at these findings?

The next we don't know yet why
I mean, newsflash yes, the moon has taken a bit of a battering over its lifetime. But what's interesting here is that this new map is double the resolution of the previous one that was being used, and that one sort of dates to the sixties and seventies and data from the Apollo program. But this one, as I say, is a much higher resolution, you know, using newer tech. And specifically, the data comes mainly from China's lunar exploration program, particularly the Changer one mission that surveyed the lunar surface from orbit and had info about the topography and the geological structures. And that was kind of verified by Chang'e three and Chang'e four. And the researchers have combined that with data from other missions, from NASA and India's ISRO, to make this quite wonderful looking atlas, which is all sorts of different colors. We'll put a link to it in the show notes, and it really gives a sense of our nearest kind of space neighbor and what it looks like.

Is blight so far?
So on the podcast, we've talked a lot about various, like, missions to the moon, like various scientific research that's going on on the moon. Will this help the sort of research that's going on there or point people towards the best crater to land on?

The next we don't know yet why
I mean, undoubtedly, that's the plan, right? So if you're going to go somewhere, it's useful to have a map of what it looks like. And so what the researchers here are saying is that this updated atlas should really help researchers, you know, understand the history of the moon and identify, as you say, potential resources and landing zones. And this atlas is available in both chinese and English. And the team say that the maps will support China's lunar ambitions and will hopefully be beneficial to other countries, too, because as we've covered a bunch, the moon is big business. We've already had several missions go this year with varying degrees of success. And China, of course, has multiple missions planned. In fact, this week they're intending to send a craft to collect rocks from the far side of the moon. But beyond that, there are plenty of future missions involving humans as well, crewed missions. And the idea is to try and put them on the surface, too. So I'm sure that having, say, a good map of where they can safely put their feet will be a very useful thing indeed.

Is blight so far?
So, as you say, now we've got this incredibly detailed map, what's sort of next for this research?

The next we don't know yet why
Well, the team aren't resting on their laurels, that's what. So apparently they've already started to improve the resolution of the maps and will produce regional maps of higher accuracy on the basis of whatever the scientific and engineering needs might be. And in the meantime, the completed atlas has been integrated into a cloud platform called the digital moon, which will eventually become available to the international research community.

Is blight so far?
That is a very good name for that. I'm looking forward to seeing those bits of the moon soon. For my story this week, coming back down to earth, we are talking about AI for a change. We don't do that very much on the podcast.

This is a story I was reading in nature about a kind of chat GPT, but for CRISPR, right, an AI.

The next we don't know yet why
Chatbot and a way of editing genomes. I mean, those aren't necessarily two things I'd initially kind of smush together.

Is blight so far?
Exactly. And I'm slightly tongue in cheek here. This is like a chat GPT, but for Crispr. So basically, it's an AI that can help you design different CRISPR based gene editors. And chat GBT is based on a large language model. This is based on a protein language model. So it's got millions of sequences of proteins, most of them like CRISPR based proteins, that have been thrown in its training data. And from that training data, they've been able to design brand new CRISPR type editing systems that people can try out.

The next we don't know yet why
And so what's the kind of the aim of this, to make gene editing easier or more efficient? What comes out the other end kind of thing?

Is blight so far?
Yes and yes. Really. So I think the initial aim is to just make it easier for researchers to find new and different, and hopefully better ways to edit genes so they can try and use this model to create new kinds of CRISPR that may be more efficient or maybe make less mistakes, because, you know, CRISPR is slightly error prone. And I think their eventual aim is to make bespoke editing systems so CRISPR works well in certain species and less well in others. So you could potentially try and make a specific kind of editing system for whatever it is you're trying to do, and that could help it be, again, more efficient and just work better.

The next we don't know yet why
And so it seems then, that the plan is to come up with, if that's the right word, CRispr and CRispr adjacent systems. Is this still very much just in a computer, or has this been demonstrated to be actually a practical approach?

Is blight so far?
So, in this article, there's a few different approaches that are discussed, but they're all based on preprints, so none of this has been peer reviewed. Just bear that in mind. But the bulk of the article focuses on one particular preprint, and in that one, they have actually tried it out for real. So they made 200 designs that the AI came up with, and they found that some of them work really well. In fact, the most promising of them was something that they called open CRISPR one. I'm assuming they think this is the first of many. And they found it was just as efficient as, you know, the sort of regularly used CRISPR cas nine. But it made fewer errors, it made fewer cuts in the wrong places. And they also span this out to make a base editor too, which we've talked about before on the podcast. But just as a reminder, a base editor is a gene editor that just swaps one particular nucleotide base. And they found this, again, was less prone to errors.

The next we don't know yet why
Of course, there are a bunch of systems like this that have evolved. I wonder if any of those that do exist have been thought up by the AI and are yet to be discovered, or have been discovered, but not compared and contrasted kind of thing.

Is blight so far?
I mean, it's entirely possible it could be coming up with the same things nature's come up with, but I guess the idea with this is to try and make ones that maybe work a bit better than nature in nature. These are sort of bacterial defense mechanisms to prevent them getting invaded by viruses. And so instead of doing that, we can sort of tweak them towards our own purposes. And, you know, the people who were interviewed for this article seem pretty impressed by this, and also by the fact that this is an open tool as well. So researchers can just freely use these tools to try and do it, whereas some of the CRISPR technologies that many researchers use are actually patented. So there are limitations on how and when you can use them.

The next we don't know yet why
Well, as you know, I have a particular fondness for anything that is ultimately related to microbiology. So that is an absolutely fantastic story. But let's leave it there for this week's briefing chat and listeners. For more on those stories and where you can sign up to the nature briefing to get more like them. Check out the show notes for some links.

Is blight so far?
And that's all for this week. If you want to keep in touch with us, you can. We're on AchurePodcast on x, or you can email us podcastature.com. I'm Nick Petro Chow.

The next we don't know yet why
And I'm Benjamin Thompson. Thanks for listening.

Deep dive into the world of science with nature
Deep dive into the world of science with nature. Plus, from the vastness of the distant star systems to the intricacies of infectious diseases due to climate change, we've got you covered. Enjoy access to over 55 cutting edge journals, breaking scientific news, and over 1000 new articles every month. Whether you're a seasoned researcher or just curious, natureplus simplifies complex studies. Plus, it's all available right at your fingertips on nature.com.

NaturePlus, the key to unlocking the world's most significant scientific advances. Subscribe today at go dot nature.com.

The next we don't know yet why
Plus, we all have smartphones, and we all know they're pretty amazing.

The Mamas bonus moms office moms moms of moms
But they can also be amazingly distracting, especially when we're around other people.

The next we don't know yet why
So us cellular wants us to reset our relationship with our phones by putting down our phones for five.

The Mamas bonus moms office moms moms of moms
That's right. A company that sells phones wants us to put down our phones and see what we find.

The next we don't know yet why
Learn more@uscellular.com.

The Mamas bonus moms office moms moms of moms
Builtforus that's uscellular.com builtforus.