Saturday Matinee: The Industry

Speaker A
There are more ways than ever to listen to history daily ad free. Listen with wondery in the Wondry app as a member of R@r.com or in Apple podcasts. Or you can get all of history daily, plus other fantastic history podcasts@intohistory.com. dot I have so many podcast ideas. I keep a running document going of various titles, concepts, and loglines, some more fleshed out than others.

But it goes on for pages and pages. Many of them id love to do. Theyd be a joy to work on. So why dont I? Well, like most things, it comes down to time and money.

I already host five ongoing podcasts and produce another three. Thats a lot. And new podcasts, even really cool ones like american criminal. Be sure youre listening. Theyre rarely overnight successes.

They require investment and work that is money. And guess what? No one's really falling over themselves to hand me fistfuls of cash so I can produce my newest pet project. But maybe if I had a bigger public profile, you know, a string of artistic and commercial successes. Maybe if I had an acclaimed body of work that stretched for decades.

Maybe if my style was instantly recognizable, individual and iconic. Maybe then I get these projects made. But as we're going to find out in today's Saturday matinee, even then, with all those accolades and advantages, I might still not get too far down my list of potential projects. Because this is exactly the situation Alfred Hitchcock found himself in. I mean, Alfred Hitchcock, his name has become an adjective.

If I say a film is hitchcockian, you know what I mean. And yet, by the close of the 1960s, presumably when Hitchcock was at the absolute height of his powers and could make any movie he wanted, he couldn't get his projects made into feature films. What was keeping him from making the movies he really wanted to make? This is the question tackled in today's episode from the industry, a podcast that explores the history of Hollywood, the insane production, scandalous lawsuits, unlikely victories, surprise defeats, and the occasional crime I hope you enjoy. While you're listening, be sure to search for and follow the industry.

We put a link in the show notes to make it easy for you.

History Daily is sponsored by Audible. You ever watch an f one race? Thrilling. Totally get the appeal, but they only last a few hours and often air at inconvenient times. So instead I get my thrills in a lower dose, stretched out over hours with a good mystery like the Penguin modern classic a story of a murder by Patrick Susskind.

As an audible member, you can choose one title every month to keep forever from the entire catalog of classics, bestsellers, new releases, and audible originals ready for listening whenever, wherever on the audible app. New members can try audible free for 30 days. Visit audible.com historydaily or text history daily to 500 500. That's audible.com historydaily or text history daily to 500 500. History Daily is sponsored by Claridon I live in Dallas, the fourth worst city in the United States for allergies.

My condolences to number one, Wichita, Kansas, because I can't imagine it any worse than it is here. And remember, I make my living with my voice. No one wants to hear me sniffly and congested. Luckily for those of us who live with the symptoms of allergies, we can live Claritin clear with claritin d designed for serious allergy sufferers, Claritin D has two powerful ingredients in just one pill that relieves your allergy symptoms and decongest your nose so you can breathe better. This double action combination of prescription strength allergy medicine and the best decongestant available relieves sneezing, a runny nose, itchy and watery eyes, itchy nose and throat, and sinus congestion and pressure with ease ready to live life as if you dont have allergies?

Its time to live claritin clear fast, powerful relief is just a quick trip away. Ask for claritin d at your local pharmacy counter. No prescription required. Go to claritin.com right now for a discount so you can live. Claritin Clear uses directed one of the.

Dan Delgado
Many aspects of the industry that fascinates me is the what ifs and the things that never happened. For example, in 1982, when ET was first released and was a box office sensation, director Steven Spielberg was fully preparing to do a sequel. But as soon as he realized that ET was a special movie to people, that it was something different, something that didn't need a sequel, he let the idea go. However, that is, after he and screenwriter Melissa Matheson had already come up with a sequel idea and wrote a treatment for it. ET, two nocturnal fears, would have had Elliot and his friends find another downed spacecraft.

But here's a plot twist. Instead of it being a friendly ET looking to go home, the kids find some very unfriendly aliens who decide to kidnap them, and then it's up to ET to rescue them. Honestly, it sounds way too intense for an ET movie, and it doesn't even sound all that good. So the fact that it never happened, I'm okay with that. Even if a part of me would like to see that movie.

And that's just one of an endless number of examples. But there's something extra tantalizing about movies that almost but never happened, especially when you're talking about a major filmmaker like Steven Spielberg or let's say, Alfred Hitchcock.

In the 1960s, Alfred Hitchcock was a man who seemingly could get any movie made, yet had as many movies not get made as he did get made, if that makes sense. And I can't help but ask why that was. So I think there are a lot of, there are a lot of answers to that question. It's a complex, you know, situation. This is Joel guns, and if you have a question about Alfred Hitchcock, Joel is the man to ask.

Joel Guns
For one thing, he was an older guy, and I think he was just like, you know, his energy. He didn't have as much fight as he did as a younger man to get all of his, his projects brought to the screen. But, but along with a lot of these issues that were sort of facing him like headwinds, here's, here's the whole situation. So by, by the early 1960s, he was one of the most powerful men in Hollywood, right? So he had brought in, he'd been brought into universal pictures, and he was their third largest shareholder.

So he was on the board, and no other director had an ownership stake in the studio that they work for. He was the first ever to do that. And so he had artistic freedom. He had, like, outright raw power within the company. And it also made him, like, took him from being rich to being, like, healthy.

Right? Amulet's, like, super rich. His, he was a household name by that time. And so, like, his name on a movie was, was going to guarantee ticket sales, you know, even, you know, in a second best scenario. And so, and then you look at, like, how he'd even gotten there.

Like, for years, he had been fighting for, you know, creative control and creative power. Remember all those fights he had with Selznick over control of the films? And, and so finally he gets into his, his golden years. He's got, he's in the, he's in the seat of power. And then you'd think he could do anything he wanted, but instead, he just, like, biffs it big time, several times.

And so it's really, it's a conundrum. So the question is still there. Why? As it turns out, there isn't just one reason, but maybe there's two. My name is Dan Delgado, and in this episode, we're taking a look at the master of suspense, Alfred Hitchcock, and the films he didnt make.

Dan Delgado
Welcome to the industry.

Alfred Hitchcock, as mentioned before by Joel Guns, had a lot of power in Hollywood by the time the 1960s rolled around. Yet he seemingly had trouble getting a number of films made, films that he really wanted to make. Keep in mind that in the early half of the 1960s, Hitch had two of his biggest hits, Psycho and the Birds. So what was the issue? Was he willingly selling out to universal and MCA by only doing the types of movies they wanted him to do?

Joel Guns
One question that you could raise is, well, okay, so what? He got so mired, you know, deeply mired in the front office and money issues that he was a sellout. And maybe. But that. That doesn't really scan right, because he had envisioned the birds as an art house film.

He had envisioned Marty as an art house film. So he was like. He was really committed to pursuing his. His artistic vision. That, again, is Joel guns.

And he'd always been that way anyway, right? He'd always, you know, been very concerned about making sure that his movies were profitable because he knew that that would get him open doors to make the next movie he wanted to make. So calling a sellout isn't. I don't think that's right. I don't think that's the right answer.

Dan Delgado
And I'm with Joel here. It doesn't seem likely that he was selling out. Which isn't to say I don't think Hitch didn't like money, but there's something else at play here. Or perhaps I should say someone else. I do think that this is where Lou Wasserman comes in.

Joel Guns
He had been Hitch's agent since, I think, around 1948. He'd been with him for. For a long time. At that time, in 1948, Hitch had his own production company called Transatlantic pictures, and that was the company that produced rope. He had signed.

He had worked with Cary Grant to take the role of Rupert Cadell and Rope. And finally Cary Grant said, nope, I'm not going to do it. And it was Wasserman who saved the day on that film because he also had James Stewart as a client. And he was able to go to Hitch and say, I got Jimmy. We can make the movie.

So right from the beginning of the relationship, Hitchcock was, like, very indebted to this guy for, you know, like, bringing the goods, delivering. And in that case, he really saved the film. And so they became good friends. Hitch came to really trust his judgment and his. And his loyalty on things.

Dan Delgado
The casual film fan may be asking themselves right now, who was Lou Wasserman? And I understand he's not a household name. The fact that we don't know his name commonly is by design. They had written it into their corporate culture that they would not be, you know, that they would not take the spotlight. So even, like, their corporate offices were a big black glass cube.

Joel Guns
Right. And then they had these, what they called the rules of the road that they had written. Rule number one was don't talk to the press. Let our clients, the talent, let them talk to the press and get the spotlight. But our agents are going to stay in the background, in the shadows.

Another one was no nepotism rule. Don't hire your nephew. Right. And then the third one, this is a, this is, this one sets the imagination aflame. They had a uniform dress code for.

Dan Delgado
All of their agents and really were underselling Lou Wasserman and not just his importance to Hollywood overall, where he loomed large in the background, but his importance to this story in particular. So im going to sidebar for just a minute or two because I want you to get an even better picture of who Wasserman was to do that, ive brought in Sean Levy. Sean is one of the great showbiz nonfiction writers of our time. Hes also the host of the limited series Glitter and Might, a podcast that tells Wasserman's story. So for our purposes here, he's going to be our Lou Wasserman expert.

So let's ask him, who was Lou Wasserman? Okay. If you picture a Hollywood agent in a dark suit with a baked tan and maybe the old time guys with the big glasses, Lou Wasserman created that look. Lou Wasserman was sort of the first Hollywood agent of the modern era. He came up in the old era, but he invented the look where every agent looked like a shark and everyone at the agency looked identical.

Sean Levy
So they were almost like robots. He did this in the 1930s and forties. He was so far ahead of his contemporaries that he was able to out business them. There were moguls who wouldn't meet with this guy after lunch because they felt too sleepy after a full meal and they thought he would get advantage on them. And he did.

Lou Wasserman broke the studio hold on acting talent with Jimmy Stewart. Instead of being under contract, he was on a per picture basis and he got a percentage of the gross that had never happened before. He created a tv network to provide programming. He didn't have a network. He had a production company.

As a talent agent, he was producing more television than any Hollywood movie studio. So he was always ahead of the competition. He had his fingers in political parties. Both the Democrats and Republicans favored him. And he was just sort of a visionary and a power broker and a master deal maker.

Dan Delgado
Now that we have an idea of who we're talking about, let's get back to Hitchcock and the films he didn't make. And by the way, this isn't even everything that's right. In the opening, I said in the sixties, Hitch had just as many films not get made as he did get made. But that's not really true. He actually had a few more films not get made than we're going to look at here.

And for the record, he had five films released in the 1960s, and we're going to look at five that he didn't make. Okay, so first up is. Yeah, the three hostages. So this would have been. It just.

Joel Guns
It tantalizes the mind to imagine what could have been with this one, because this was. This would have been his follow up to the 39 steps. So this is 1964, and it's based on a novel by John Buchan, the three hostages. And it features Richard Hannay, who's the main character in the 39 steps. And so it just takes that character and it puts him in a whole new set of capers.

And so what could have been right? And so. And this is like. So this is 1964. James Bond had just, you know, his cousin out and is kind of stealing a little bit of his thunder, but it's also kind of an homage to his work.

And so this would have been his chance to sort of regain control of the, you know, the spy film genre. So I'm sure he had that in mind, you know, that he was like, this is the competition. This is where the winds were blowing. So anyway, so that was the basic idea behind it, but there were some problems with it. The novel is really set in the 1930s, and adapting it to the 1960s would have been a pretty difficult move.

One of the key scenes, one of the main reasons he wanted to film this novel was because it includes a scene in which the villain's blind mother hypnotizes Richard Hannay and puts him in a hypnotic trance and, you know, sort of manipulates him. He felt that was kind of a dated idea, this idea of hypnotism. And, you know, that he felt it just didn't really translate well to film. He couldn't find a good workaround for that. So the movie was left behind.

Dan Delgado
Let's put this one in the category of an artistic decision. Or better yet, let's call it an artistic drop on Hitch's part.

Speaker A
History. Daily is sponsored by Mint Mobile. Thought experiment. You're hungry and there on the street are two vendors. But the two vendors serve exactly the same thing.

How do you choose? Well, once you're convinced that they're really identical, same food, same quality, then it's just price, right? If one is less expensive, your decision is made simple. So why is it that you haven't switched to mint mobile yet? Unlimited talk, text and data identical to other big wireless providers, but for just dollar 15 a month.

Because they sell online, cutting the costs of retail stores and passing those savings to you. That was perfect for resurrecting an old phone for my daughter. And I promise you, the emojis she sends her friends are identical to those sent on other, more costly services. To get this new customer offer and your new three month unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month, go to mintmobile.com historydaily that's mintmobile.com historydaily cut your wireless bill to $15 a month@mintmobile.com. historyDaily Dollar 45 upfront payment required equivalent to dollar 15 a month new customers on first three month plan only speed slower above 40 gb on unlimited plan.

Additional taxes, fees and restrictions apply. Cmint Mobile for details. History Daily is sponsored by Greenlight watching your kids grow is one of the wonders of the world. Every year they become more and more themselves as they learn to talk, express themselves and reason. But theyre still learning lots of lessons along the way, like how expensive that pink Stanley mug really is.

And my daughter wont know the value of a dollar unless shes managing it herself. She earns it herself. She saves it herself. She spends it herself on a pink Stanley mug. Thats where Greenlight comes in.

Greenlight is a debit card and money app made for families. You can send your kids instant money transfers, get real time notifications of spending, managed chores, and automate allowance. Meanwhile, your kids build financial literacy and independence by learning to earn, save, and spend wisely. Even on pink Stanley mugs, millions of parents and kids are learning about money on Greenlight, the easy, convenient way to raise financially smart kids. Sign out for Greenlight today and get your first month free@greenlight.com.

historydaily thats greenlight.com historydaily to try Greenlight for free. Greenlight.com historydaily from the three hostages, we. Move on to RRR. And that's four r's, mind you. And no, this had nothing to do with everyone's favorite movie from India from last year.

Joel Guns
All right, this is a personal favorite of mine that got away, and I would have liked to see this happen because Hitch was really good with this kind of setup. Okay, so, first of all, this is 1965, and he has been binge watching italian neorealist cinema. He just can't get enough of Michelangelo Antonioni, you know, blow up, red desert, all of that. And he himself was just completely obsessed with this new italian wave of cinema and their use of color and their approach to storytelling. And he was feeling kind of like his.

I think he had real. He was starting to realize that his style was becoming a little bit old hat. In other words, you know, if in 1959, he can make north by northwest, and it changes. It opens up a whole new genre of filmmaking. But now, you know, James Bond franchise comes along and is doing the same thing.

He's realizing that he's been imitated. He doesn't want to just, you know, keep doing the same old hat himself. So he's kind of, like, casting around, fishing around for new directions to go in, and he settled on this italian, you know, new wave. Right. Okay.

And so the story is about this. It's an italian story, and it's set in. I believe it's set in New York. Yeah. And it's about a hotel manager.

Not unbeknownst to him, his family is running a crime ring right under his nose, and they steal things, and then they fence it. They make their money. So. And that's where the title comes from. So RR is the highest rating that you can give a collector coin.

Dan Delgado
Ah, okay. Very nice. So there's your mcgill, right? Yes. And so.

Joel Guns
And so this. The story would have been, you know, rather than featuring necessarily a starring actor or a starring character, it would have been more of an ensemble piece about everybody in this family engaging their little piece at the same time the hotel manager is running the hotel. So we get to see the inner workings of how hotels get, you know, how they get operated, how the kitchen works, the disaster in the kitchen that becomes a gourmet meal in the dining room, and the chaos in the laundry room that turns into these well appointed hotel rooms. He was really into all that. It would have been much more exciting.

It would have had more action. It would have lots of room for comedy. You can already hear the. You know, you can already see those comedic scenes working out. Now, I personally think this movie sounds very cool.

Dan Delgado
So why didn't it happen? So he had hired a couple of. A pair of italian writers who were. They were a team. Age and Scarpelli and or age, I think it's pronounced and they started working on it.

Joel Guns
But their work was great. They're fantastic, they're beloved in Italy, but their English wasn't so good, and his Italian was even worse. And so language barriers kept them from really making the connection that they'd hoped for. Plus, the writers just didn't get their hands around the story, so it just didn't develop. But he kept pushing on it, and he could have made it.

Jill, if he had a project that he worked on and the writers weren't working out, he knew he could just fire the writers and hit his black book and get the next one online. That was standard operating procedure for him, right? I would think so, yes. But he faced resistance from Universal Pictures, rather, and Lou Wasserman was not into it. So let's put this one in a separate category.

Dan Delgado
If the three hostages was an artistic drop, then this was the Wasserman influence. And how big of an influence was Wasserman on Hitchcock, anyway? What was this relationship like? Wasserman became a Hitchcock's agent in the 1940s. Wasserman's first client was Ronald Reagan.

Sean Levy
And Reagan was a b movie actor and a terrible b movie actor. He had charisma, but he had no talent. And Wasserman cut a deal in the early 1940s for Reagan at Warner Brothers, and he asked for an unusual length of time on the deal. Every deal was for like 45 weeks a year, and Wasserman wanted 47 weeks a year. And Warner Brothers didn't understand why.

And when the ink was dry, Jack Warner said, why did we just cut a deal for 47 weeks? And Wasserman said, because it's now a million dollar deal. When you look at all the money in all the years, and when that first million dollar deal got signed for Ronald Reagan, of all people, major talent went toward MCA. And Alfred Hitchcock was one of those people who dumped his previous agency and went to MCA on the back of the Reagan deal. The two became friends.

They socialized together frequently with their wives. And when Wasserman started producing television shows, he went to Hitchcock and said, get into this. This is the future. This is where the money is. And instead of paying you a salary, we're going to pay you in MCA stock.

And when Alfred Hitchcock died, he was the third or fourth largest shareholder in MCA Universal, as it then was. He was worth, you know, eight figures based on that agreement with Wasserman. There's a very famous story about people walking through the MCA offices complaining that television was taking over for the movies. And Hitchcock was in with Wasserman and he stuck his head out the door and said, would you all please be quiet? We're busy counting our money in here.

So, you know, Wasserman brought Hitchcock from Paramount to Universal, where he made psycho and the last movies of his career up through family plot. He physically brought Hitchcock. Hitchcock's offices were located on the universal lot. Once Wasserman owned the lot, and they truly were friends. When Wasserman was given the Gene Hirschholt humanitarian award at the Oscars in 1973, Alfred Hitchcock presented it to him.

Dan Delgado
Okay, now let's get back to the movies. Next we're going to look at Mary Rose. This is the one. This is like, you know, this is his rosebud from Citizen Kane. You know, this is the one that really got away.

Joel Guns
That hurts. That cuts deep. Donald's photo in his biography said that this was perhaps the single greatest disappointment of his creative life. All right, first, let's discuss, what was the movie going to be about? What was the plot?

Dan Delgado
How far along did it get? Yeah. Okay, so he had first seen it in 1920. He was 2021 years old when he saw it. He probably saw it alone and on stage because it's based on a play by JM Barrie, who wrote Peter Pan.

Joel Guns
And so I think that's, like, the way into this story and the way into, like, how it captures your imagination is to think of it as sort of a, an alternative telling of Peter Pan. You've got this mysterious island that people disappear off to where time collapses. You've got, it's got this misty mood about it. It's about memory. So the subtitle of the play was the island that likes to be visited.

And it's set in sort of on, on the mainland or in real time around this haunted mansion. And this young couple with their son, they go off to. To visit one of the islands. So it's set in Scotland, and they go hop in their boat, go to a small island to go visit and have a picnic. And the husband and wife and their small son.

The wife wanders off to go for a little walk, and she disappears into the mist. And she's gone forever. She's gone for decades. And then years later, she shows up and she's the same age that she's always been. So she's, you know, young and beautiful in her twenties, let's say.

And her husband, though, has died and her son has grown up, and now her son is older than she is, and now they have to figure out what to do about that. So that's the basic idea of the plot. So. So it's very much about this notion of ambiguous loss, losing someone, but not really knowing if they're dead or alive. Also, these stories of memory.

And so Hitchcock, imagine him 20 years old. He's already very much in a dreamy, romantic, metaphysical frame of mind. Like, we all are at that age, ready to believe in our dreams, right? And it just got under his skin. And so he tried to get it made in the mid forties, while he was working on lifeboat, he went to 20th Century Fox and said, okay, I've got my follow up film for lifeboat, which also, by the way, kind of has a misty mood about it at times.

And they said, no, we're gonna pass. It's, you know, you're known as a master of suspense. You're not known for ghost stories. And so then he got into the fifties, and he pitched Paramount on it, and Grace Kelly was attached to it. We could have seen Grace Kelly go off in the mess.

Slam dunk, right? Nope, didn't happen. He wanted to get this film made. So finally we needed. Oh, go ahead.

Dan Delgado
Well, what happened with the Grace Kelly attempt? Did they. Paramount pass? Yeah. So Paramount passed.

Joel Guns
They said, not our kind of film. History Daily is sponsored by indeed. Anyone know of someone whos an expert historical researcher, has the story sense of a screenwriter, but also can edit audio, compose music, and do sound design? That would be my perfect employee. Finding them would be tough, admittedly.

Speaker A
Who would have that fantasy skill set if I believed that person was actually out there? Id be searching for days, weeks, months. But when it comes to hiring, perhaps the best way to search for a candidate isnt to search at all. Yeah, dont search match with indeed. With over 350 million global monthly visitors, according to indeed data, their matching engine helps you find quality candidates fast.

And history daily listeners will get a $75 sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility@indeed.com. onThisDay just go to indeed.com onthisday right now and support the show by saying, you heard about indeed on this podcast. Thats indeed.com onthisday. Terms and conditions apply. Need to hire you.

Need indeed. Do you ever wonder where all your money went? Like, every single time you look at your bank account, honestly, it's probably all those subscriptions. I felt that way, too, until I got Rocket money. Rocket money helped me see all the subscriptions I'm paying for, and it was eye opening.

Speaker E
Between streaming services, fitness apps, delivery services, it all adds up so quickly. Rocket Money is a personal finance app that finds and cancels your unwanted subscriptions, monitors your spending and helps lower your bills. Rocket Money has over 5 million users and has helped save its members an average of $720 a year. With over 500 million in canceled subscriptions. Stop wasting money on things you dont use.

Cancel your unwanted subscriptions by going to rocketmoney.com wondry thats rocketmoney.com wondery. Rocketmoney.com wondry. And I want to quickly interrupt here to say, paramount Pictures, how dare you. So it's 44 years later, right? And he's still trying to get this damn movie made.

Joel Guns
So he's working on Marty, and he's got Jay Press and Allen writing the screenplay for Marty. And he's really having a great time working with her. She's working out great. She's just a lot of fun to be with. They get each other.

She gets his jokes. And so he, you know, makes the pitch to her, hey, do you want to work on this next string play? And she says, yeah, sure. Let me give a shot at, give it a shot. So she starts noodling around some ideas on it.

And Hitch and Alma, they take off for a two week trip to Scotland. They're scouting locations in Glasgow and the Isle of Skye and all these little islands beyond. And they're like he's, they're working on Marnie and he's already planning his next film. He's ready to go on Mary Rose. And then, you know, wouldn't you know it, he gets it into the pitch phase.

The black suit mafia says, nope, not going to do it. Not only was it a nope, it was a hard nope. They said, not only can you not do it, but Hitch claimed for the rest of his career that they actually wrote it into his contract that he could make any movie he wanted except Mary Rose. No kidding. That is quite the right into a contract.

Dan Delgado
You can make any movie, but not that one. Yeah. And do we know why? I mean, I'm guessing they just thought it wasn't gonna sell. They just didn't believe in it.

Right. That's the bottom line. You know, money. But again, they felt it was off brand for him. They didn't see him as a ghost story director.

Joel Guns
He made down to earth suspense films, not ethereal ghost films. So this is the one that this one hurts. This one hurts a lot. You know, he really took that one to his grave as a loss. Mary Rose was made as a british tv movie in 1987 and again as a low budget feature in 2016.

Dan Delgado
As far as Hitchcock's version, though, this is definitely the Wasserman influence at play. Here, this brings us to kaleidoscope. And Kaleidoscope was a movie that was also known by the title of Frenzy as well. But since Hitchcock did eventually make a movie called Frenzy in 1972, we're just going to stick with kaleidoscope as the name. So the story that would have been kaleidoscope was.

Joel Guns
It's another serial killer story. And in his pitch to it, he described it as a sort of. He didn't use the word prequel, but as the story behind Uncle Charlie in shadow of a doubt. So in shadow of a doubt, he plays a serial killer who kills wealthy widows for their money. And this would have.

And. But we don't see him kill any widows in shadow of a doubt. In Kaleidoscope, we would have seen that backstory where he kills three young women for his, you know, for financial gain and also for, you know, his perverse pleasure. All right, on a scale of one to ten, Joel, how messed up would this have been? Okay, that's the problem with kaleidoscope, because everybody was saying that this is like an eleven.

That's. And that was the primary pushback that he got on it. He was having a hard time, you know, finding people to collaborate with it, with him on it, because they just thought it was too squeamy. You would have had to be clear. The three women that he kills would have been young women, and it would have been a murder rape situation, and it would have had lots of nudity in it, and so just would have been very hard to.

But it's interesting to see how he would have worked out those problems. So maybe just back up a little bit. It's a serial killer story set in New York City, and the. And it's set in iconic locations in New York City. So first of all, the first murder takes place in Central park, and it's a young woman who works on Wall street.

Then, you know, the second murder, or, excuse me, the first murder takes place by a waterfall in Central park. Second place takes place by. On the mothball fleet of ships that is, or was outside New York City. And it was kind of a big deal, would have been very pickeresque. There was a scene that was supposed to take place at Yankee Stadium, so they were really going to make use of the city.

And you can kind of. I think the way in to think about this is this would have done for New York City what he had done for London and San Francisco in his other films. Kaleidoscope was an example of hitch pushing the envelope, and it definitely turned some people off. But this wasn't the first time that had happened to him. People crapped all over psycho when he was trying to get it made, and he could not get it made.

He had to finance it himself. And that's why he owned it, and that's why it made him so many piles of money, because nobody wanted to touch it. And it turned out to be the biggest thing ever, right? So, same thing happened. People read the script and they just.

They turned it down. They said, we don't have an appetite for this kind of sex and violence. And so that's the number one main reason that people said no to this. But he set it up for success. So, like, the first draft of the screenplay was written by Robert Block, who had written the novel psycho.

So, you know, he brought in somebody he knew that could handle the story. Well, that relationship didn't work out. He dropped out of the project and then he brought in Ben Levy that he'd been working with. They'd been best friends, old friends since the thirties. He had helped write blackmail and brought him in to help tell the story.

And, you know, there's. There's a wonderful transcript of. Bits of. Transcript of conversation between Hitch and Alma in story conferences, and they're talking about how to handle the violence and also there's lots of nudity. And he had it worked out.

He had the problem solved, that they would, like, do it in the semi darkness. They're going to be aboard this ship on the mothball fleet, where the light from. What would be coming in from outside through these metal grilles, and so it would leave, like, striped lighting all over their bodies. So you wouldn't really see the nudity as frankly. Also, you know, you can just.

You can hear his graphic mind working on this, that graphically, it would have been very interesting, these knives of light, as he's trying to stab her to death. Hitchcock even went around New York City and shot test footage in anticipation for a kaleidoscope. He had a photographer named Arthur Shantz take pictures as well. Here's Shantz in a 1999 documentary on Hitchcock, talking about his experience. We went to about 15 locations around the city of New York, and we went upstate New York, and we went to the maritime harbor where all the liberty ships are berthed.

Arthur Shantz
We did all places where there was a great body of water. Turns out that water figured very heavily into the story. And every time this young boy saw water and stuff, he got turned on and he had to commit a murder. This was a film that he was strongly believed in and really wanted to do. You can see that test footage for kaleidoscope on YouTube.

Dan Delgado
I'll have a link to it in the show notes. There's no sound, but it is really interesting. Also, what I find really interesting is that the people in the footage, the actors that they hired, are all unknown. And when I say unknown, I mean there is literally no record of who these people are or were, which is really crazy to me that there's some people out there walking around who were directed by Alfred Hitchcock in the 1960s and no one knows who they are. So when it came to kaleidoscope, what happened?

Joel Guns
He finally brought it to MCA or to universal at that time, and Wasserman probably at the head of the table, and he pitched it, did the script, did the dog and pony show, and not only did they say no, they promptly picked up all available copies of the script from the conference room. They confiscated them from other people who had them, and they said, not going to happen. Okay, but Joel, correct me if I'm wrong, Mister Hitchcock has a clause in his contract that says he can make any movie he wants as long as it's not Mary Rose. This is not Mary Rose. Why doesn't that clause apply here?

That's. Okay. So that's the million dollar question right there. Why didn't he do it? None of these people was his superior.

He had no bosses. He was the boss. So he had no claws. Nothing to stop him, nothing for him to just say, screw you, I'm going to finance it myself. He had the money.

I'm going to make it myself, and I'm going to make all the money myself. He didn't do that. So I think part of it was, you know, we talked about this publicly. He had been talking at this time about, you know, being beholden to universal and engaging in these, you know, concerns about the financial ethics. He had no moral ethics, you know, but financial ethics, he was.

He's claimed to be taking that very seriously. But when you stop and think about it, black suit, white shirt, black tie, he was just as mobbed up as everybody, right? Yeah. And so, you know, like, in that kind of a situation, he may have been equals with Lou Wasserman at this point, but there can only be one boss, and everybody knew who that was and it wasn't Hitchcock. And, you know, so when you think about it, like, you can push, you can argue, you can cajole, but at the end of the day, you know, you're going to think twice about really going toe to toe with these guys.

Dan Delgado
Here comes the Wasserman influence again. And this brings up a good question. Joel uses the phrase mobbed up there and he says that Lou Wasserman, MCA. Agency, they were totally mobbed up. Right.

Joel Guns
They were tied to a Chicago syndicate known as the outfit. You know, the outfit that was run by Al Capone back in the day. They were those wise guys. Let's go back to Sean Levy one more time to see how accurate that is. Just how mobbed up was Lou Wasserman.

Sean Levy
Lou Wasserman came up in Cleveland and worked in a mob run casino. That was his first job. And that's where he was hired by music Corporation of America, MCA, which was the talent agency he worked for. MCA was founded in Chicago in the twenties when Al Capone ran the town. You couldn't book an organ grinder onto a street corner without dealing with the Capone organization.

So MCA and the mob have been connected since the MCA was formed. Wasserman couldn't put a button on somebody and have them erased. But he spoke every day of his business life. And there are telephone records and documents to prove this with Sidney Korshak, who was the mobs lawyer in Los Angeles and Las Vegas. So was he a mobster?

No. Was he mobbed up in the sense, like he had obligations? No. But did he avail himself of those connections? Yes.

The mob ran labor unions. And Lew Wasserman, when he needed to do things like settle a writers strike, could go to Sidney Korshack and his mob connections and say, let's grease these wheels and get people back to work. So that one does kind of check out. Okay, we've got one more unmade Hitchcock film to look at. Although there's a caveat here because this one was sort of made.

Joel Guns
This is a bonus film because I don't even know how far it had gotten. It may have just been in the conceptual stage and not much farther than that. But just because this is the 60th anniversary of the birds. The birds was originally envisioned not as a bird movie, but as an alien invasion movie. And he had it all worked out.

He had, I don't know how far down the road he had gone, but he was trying to follow up psycho. And he needed something. He wanted something out of this world. And so, yeah, it was going to be an alien invasion movie. And it would have followed the same apocalyptic storyline that eventually became the birds.

Dan Delgado
And do we know what compelled him to change course? Yeah, I think part of what's going on with some of these films that get canned are he had also boxed himself in with the kinds of movies that he made. So he said that he could never make a Disney movie because he could never direct Cinderella because people would be looking for her mother in the trunk. And so same thing. Like, he wasn't really known for doing Sci-Fi and so that's what persuaded him eventually to introduce this element that is also based on a Daphne du Maurier story.

Joel Guns
And of course, he'd already filmed, made two other films based on her work, so it was more in his wheelhouse. So this sounds more like an artistic drop. Yeah, maybe instead of calling it an artistic drop, this one could be a Hitchcock pivot. I normally find bras to be so uncomfortable and constricting, but Skims has changed that. You know, I love skims underwear, so I finally tried their bras, and skims has delivered again.

Speaker G
Skims bras are worth the hype for the amazing shape and support they give, but what I wasn't expecting was how comfortable they are, too. I've tried so many bras in the past, and the main issue that I have is that they weren't supportive enough to the point where they felt slouchy. I love my Skims wireless form bra because it's so comfortable and supportive. The older I get, the more I care about actually being comfortable in what I wear every day. And with my wireless form bra, I no longer have to sacrifice my comfort for the support I need.

Shop skims bras@skims.com now available in 62 sizes, 30 a to 46 h plus. Get free shipping on all orders over $75. If you haven't yet, be sure to let them know we sent you. After you place your order, select podcast in the survey and select our show in the dropdown menu that follows.

Saturday Matinee: The Industry

Primary Topic

Episode Summary

Main Takeaways

Episode Chapters

1. Introduction to Hitchcock's Unmade Projects

2. The Three Hostages and Kaleidoscope

3. Influence of Lou Wasserman

4. Industry Dynamics and Creative Challenges

Actionable Advice

About This Episode

People

Companies

Books

Guest Name(s):

Content Warnings:

Transcript