Erik Larson On The Dawn Of The Civil War

PBS

Support for NPR and the following message come from PBS. PBS invites you on a trip to the future. A brief history of the Future is a groundbreaking series about people's futures and how they can be reimagined. A brief history of the future stream now on PBS and the PBS app. This is FRESH AIR.

Dave Davies

I'm Dave Davies. When the country is deeply divided and political rivals come to see each other not merely as competitors, but as enemies determined to destroy the nation, where does it take us? My guest, journalist and historian Eric Larson, has a new book closely examining the period between the election of Abraham Lincoln as president in 1860 and the bombardment of Fort Sumter in Charleston five months later, which sparked the long and bloody civil war between the north and south. Larsen was researching the Civil War on January 6, 2021, when the assault on the US Capitol occurred. He writes that he had the eerie feeling that present and past had merged.

It was unsettling. He writes that in 1861, two great moments of national dread centered on the certification of the Electoral College vote and the presidential inauguration. Larson's book focuses on key players in the drama that followed Lincoln's election, as it appeared that the long simmering conflict over slavery in the United States might finally be headed towards a violent resolution. Eric Larsen is the author of eight previous books, six of them national bestsellers. He was last on fresh air to talk about his profile of Winston Churchill's leadership in World War Two, titled the Splendid and the Vile.

His new book is the Demon of a Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and heroism at the dawn of the Civil War. Well, Eric Larsen, welcome back to Fresh Air. Well, thank you. You know, as I mentioned in the introduction, when the assault on the Capitol occurred in 2021, there was a resonance, you felt, with the period you were studying, which was when the nation was approaching the Civil War. And I just wonder, as you have watched american politics unfold, as your research continued, did you find yourself thinking, oh, you know, this public figure of today reminds me of someone in the pre civil warfare period, or this act of extremism or compromise reminded you of something that you were researching?

Eric Larsen

Well, what it is is that rather than any one particular individual reminding me of, of some character in my book, because, honestly, the characters that I've chosen to represent in this book are really quite unique in their nature. What does strike me as very much a parallel is this discord, this intense discord that seems to be running through the political intercourse in this country right now. And this idea of the demon of unrest, really, I think, is still very much current. It's almost as if there is this demon afoot in the land. And sometimes, frankly, it's a little hard to understand exactly why.

Dave Davies

Well, let's get into the story here. It begins in South Carolina, and a question you pose early is, how did South Carolina, a scantily populated state, become the fulcrum for America's greatest tragedy? Tell us something about South Carolina of 1860 and its principal city, Charleston. So, South Carolina in 1860 was a state in decline. It was a small state, relatively primitive state.

Eric Larsen

It was known throughout the south as being sort of perpetually in rebellion, perpetually cantankerous, always sort of at the leading edge of discord. And come 1860, all of that sort of coalesced with the state on December 20, 1860, deciding to secede from the union after the election of Abraham Lincoln. So it was a series of forces that came to play political structures in South Carolina. The fact that the slave owning patriarchy, the slavocracy, as some called it, and the chivalry, as they called themselves, held all of power, and they were absolutely reliant on slavery. There was no question of that.

And they feared. They feared, perhaps irrationally, that Abraham Lincoln had plans to immediately abolish slavery, and they could not countenance that. And that was really the fuel that led to their vote on December 20, 1860, to secede. They seceded months before Lincoln was even inaugurated. Yes, there were 110,000 more enslaved blacks in South Carolina than whites.

Dave Davies

The planters, as you call them, essentially, the landholders called themselves the chivalry. Did that have. What did that mean? Why that name? I found that fascinating to actually call themselves the chivalry.

Eric Larsen

But what that really spoke to was their sense of honor, this deep seated culture of honor. And it was fascinating to me because it was fed, actually, or reinforced by, incredibly, by romantic literature, by Sir Walter Scott, by Tennyson. They embraced these books. The book Ivanhoe was just on everybody's shelf. The chivalry even engaged in what was referred to as rings tournaments, or actually, sometimes heads and rings tournaments, where they would dress up as knights and adopt a knight Persona from Sir Walter Scott or some other writer of chivalric literature.

And then they would ride wildly down this course with lances, trying to pierce small hanging rings instead of jousting, of course, with each other. And then at the end of this, if it was a heads and rings tournament, the goal was to, you're done. You pull out your saber and you hack away at this inanimate figure, thankfully, inanimate figure at the end of the course. So this chivalry thing was a real phenomenon, and what it really reflected was this deep sense of honor. Right.

Dave Davies

And, of course, this meant you would treat other whites honorably. The enslaved blacks, who. Who were the mainstay of the economies, were treated, of course, very cruelly. Well, yes, of course, you know, the chivalry aspect, it's very important to understand how this whole thing came about. You know, there was.

Eric Larsen

In 1800, the world began. There was this v that began to form with regard to slavery. Britain banned the international trade in slavery. The United States banned the international trade and slavery in 1802, but allowed the domestic trade to continue. But the north and the advanced states of Europe began moving more and more away from any sort of acceptance of slavery.

It became repulsive and something to be reviled as it did so in the south. The American south was one of the last holdouts with regard to slavery. With the north hammering away at the south, accusing them of all these evil things. The south developed, interestingly, began to persuade itself that slavery was actually a positive good. This was the whole pro slavery ethos.

So you had this v ever widening, this rift, ever widening, between the rest of the world, which saw slavery as an unalloyed evil, and the south, which began to convince itself, and ultimately did convince itself that slavery was a positive good. The v being plunging support for slavery everywhere else and the rise in the south. So as the nation was increasingly divided over slavery and the rhetoric was increasingly intense, the election of 1860 loomed, which put Abraham Lincoln in the White House. This was a contentious and unusual contest. I mean, it's briefly, just explain what happened in this presidential election.

There are four candidates running for president, Lincoln being one of them. And interestingly, in ten southern states, they wouldn't even put him on the ballot. They were so afraid and so angry about him being potential, being the republican nominee for president. So you've got these four candidates on the ballot which pretty much assured that Abraham Lincoln would be the victor in this race. Abraham Lincoln had been very, very direct about the fact that his goal was not the abolition of slavery at all.

He had no interest in that. In fact, he had interesting opinions about abolitionists. His goal was to prevent the expansion of slavery, find that it existed where it was. He even went so far as to support the Fugitive Slave act of 1850, which to northern abolitionists, northern anti slavery people, was just a horror. This was an act that allowed southern planters to travel north to seize fugitive slaves and bring them back to the south for trial or punishment or whatever they wanted to do.

This had led in turn, in the north, to the advent of so called personal liberty laws, which then further offended the south. This was another affront to them. But anyway, so here you have Lincoln. He's proposing one thing. The south is convinced that he actually means to do something very different, and that's what happened as of November 6, 1860.

Dave Davies

Right. So there's four candidates in the race. He gets about 40% of the popular vote, but gets an electoral majority. So it's kind of like modern times. There are, you know, ways to dispute what might happen.

But the south saw this as a seminal moment, and despite what he'd said about slavery, believed Lincoln would put an end to it. And so South Carolina seceded within a month or so. So let's talk about Fort Sumter. I mean, it was this fort on an island in Charleston harbor. I would say, if folks have never visited Charleston, it's a great place to visit, and it's really striking to see this fort out there in the harbor, but it was one of, you know, many federal military installations around the country.

Why did this particular fort become the focus of such enormous tension? Over the next four months? In Charleston harbor, there was a significant federal presence which had been. Had evolved mainly because of an engineering effort to build fortifications to prevent attack from foreign powers by the sea. So Charleston Harbor, a lovely spot, by the way.

Eric Larsen

Charleston harbor had a number of fortifications, Fort Sumter being one, Fort Sumter being the most prominent in South Carolina's view. Ominous of them. A classic sea fortress surrounded by water. But there was also another fort, very well armed, again meant for the defense of America against foreign fleets called Fort Moultrie. There was also another fort, Castle Pinckney, Fort Johnson.

There was an arsenal and so forth. And these were under the control of the United States army. And as South Carolina moved increasingly towards secession, they began to seem increasingly like this affront to South Carolina autonomy. It was sort of like a thorn in the eye for South Carolina, and this became a source of immense tension. Right, right.

Dave Davies

So you have this, you know, this fortress which could, you know, if it were an issue, it could prevent, you know, ships from coming into Charleston harbor, but it was really, in a way, an assault on the honor of the Confederates, or the confederates to be that this Union fortress was there. It was commanded by a guy named Major Robert Anderson, who was, you say, sympathetic to the south. Was he a southerner himself? Yeah, he was a southerner himself. He was actually a former slave owner.

Eric Larsen

He was married to a woman who was from Georgia, who came from a prominent slave owning family. Robert Anderson and his wife had sold their slaves. Anderson, while he was sympathetic to the south, his loyalty, his true loyalty, unshakable, was to the United States army. He had made an oath to the army, and by God, he would adhere to that oath. So here he is.

He's put in charge of federal, all the federal presence in Charleston harbor, and, you know, but the idea, undoubtedly, that he might help mollify the south. So Robert Anderson, who was the union commander of Fort Sumter and the other facilities around Charleston harbor, in December, around Christmas time, he does something he, without telling anybody, he kind of does it stealthily. He shuts down the other forts. The Union forces at Fort Moultrie sets fire to the casings of the cannons, moves all of those military forces to Fort Sumter, the one that's on the island in the middle of the harbor. Now, in doing this, he doesn't fire on any southerners.

Dave Davies

He doesn't kill anybody. He just reassembles his forces into this one less vulnerable fort. This was a huge deal, right? Why? This was a huge deal.

Eric Larsen

And I think it's important also to recognize just a little more detail on how anderson did this. He sensed that things were coming to the point where conflict could turn to violence. And that fort where his headquarters were, Fort Moultrie in Charleston harbor, was about as vulnerable a fortress could be, because from the battlements in front, which were meant to defend against these so called foreign invaders, it was a strong fortress, but nobody expected that they'd have to defend against Americans coming from behind. So this thing was absolutely vulnerable. He recognized this, and he gets this plan that he is going to move all his people to Fort Sumter, and he's going.

And he keeps this plan secret, even from his officers. He's going to move these contingents, a skimpy contingent. He only has 75 men when the fort Sumter complement, as designed, should have had, like, 650 men. But he moves the men and their families and their families under cover of darkness. It's a very, very tense move, actually.

It could have gone so wrong. But he moves them, and one of his goals was to take advantage of the Christmas weekend. He wanted to move them. Actually, on the evening of Christmas Day, December 25, the weather was too stormy to allow the passage of these boats, so he decided they would do it the following night. And he pulls it off, miraculously, without conflict.

The first sign of this for people in Charleston the next morning is smoke rising from Fort Moultrie, where he has ordered the gun carriages of the cannon burned and the cannon spiked, that is, some metal forced into their touch holes so that they couldn't be fired. And so there's this fortress, this presence that was already absolutely infuriating to South Carolina. Suddenly it becomes even more so. I mean, suddenly, forces in Charleston seize all the other forts. They seize Moultrie, they seize Pinckney, they seize Fort Johnson.

They seize the federal arsenal. But here still is this fort Sumter sitting out there on this island as a proposal, perpetual rebuke to everything that now South Carolina holds holy. Right? And so the question was, would the southerners attack the fort? Would people in the fort fire on southern forces?

Dave Davies

And the intention reigned for months. Well, it's important to know also at this point that in December of 1860, that Fort Sumter, while it looks incredibly imposing, is this immense brick and earth and stone presence on a man made atoll. But this fort, this fort Sumter was nowhere near complete. Only a few of its guns were mounted. And so suddenly, Anderson arrives with these families and has to mount the guns, make this fort as impregnable as he possibly can with this small complement of men and some laborers imported also.

So, if we look at the situation as 1860 comes to an end, Abraham Lincoln has been. Is the apparent winner of the election, but the vote hasn't been certified. That doesn't happen until mid February, later than it is nowadays. And so he's in Illinois, the incumbent democratic president, pro slavery President James Buchanan, is kind of just trying to navigate this situation in which southern states are beginning to secede. Right?

I mean, it was, South Carolina seceded in December, and then in January, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama. So the nation is kind of beginning to come apart. And there's a lot of focus on Fort Sumter, this island fortress in the harbor of Charleston, where a Union garrison is holding tight and not surrendering to southern forces, who would see that as territory they can now occupy. So you got Abe Lincoln. He's in Illinois watching all this happen.

He eventually makes his way towards Washington for the inauguration. He gives many, many speeches. What does he have to say about what's going in the country? What posture does he strike? Well, before we get to Lincoln's, really, I think, charming and amazing journey, I think it's important to note what happened in between.

Eric Larsen

And I think it's a big part of the story from November 6, when Lincoln was elected. I mean, Lincoln was enough of a lawyer to recognize he was not president yet, even when the electoral vote was counted. Yes, he'd be more president, if you will, but he would not be the president until inauguration day, which is March 4, in that time. And so he decides that he's not going to, he's not going to overtly say anything. He's not going to interfere with the political situation as it exists now.

Quietly, he seeds the clouds with remarks that he wants others to give and newspapers and so forth. But he himself keeps silent. You know, there's sort of this great silence. Simultaneously, we have James Buchanan, who's lackluster, it's a nice way to put it, whose lackluster administration is coming to a close. He's not doing anything either.

He's absolutely inert. All he wants, all he wants is to get out of this administration without a war on his side of the ledger. He wants to get back to his estate in Pennsylvania outside Lancaster called Wheatlands, and in the worst way. So there's nobody really addressing this crisis. As things begin to intensify, Lincoln does.

Dave Davies

Make it clear in his remark from time to time that he is not seeking to immediately abolish slavery, but that doesn't seem to convince anybody in the south because states continue to secede again in advance of his even being inaugurated in February, mid February, there was the certification of the electoral votes which would secure Lincoln's win. And he was a bit concerned about this. Yes. The army moved into Washington to ensure order. There were rumors of southern militias that might try and disrupt it.

It actually, well, what actually happened when the electors met? Yeah. So the electoral count took place. And even more adding to the narrative tension, you know, is the fact that the vice president, who was going to be counting the electoral vote, certified electoral vote, had been Lincolns closest competitor in the elections. He was a candidate for president.

Eric Larsen

Yes, exactly. So youve got this thing shaping up that is very reminiscent, honestly, of January 6, 2021. The electoral count went off just fine. Now, there were moments when there was a report of a clamoring mob trying to get in, but overall, it was a very orderly thing. Winfield Scott, the commanding general at that time, had made sure that he had forces in place to try to stem any attempt to disrupt the count, and it came off fine.

Dave Davies

We're going to take a break here. Let me reintroduce you. We are speaking with Eric Larsen. His new book is the Demon of Unrest, a saga of hubris, heartbreak and heroism at the dawn of the civil war. He'll be back to talk more after a short break.

I'm Dave Davies, and this is fresh air. This message comes from NPR's sponsor, ACorn TV. ACorn TV isn't just good it's brilliant. With exceptional television from around the world. Their romances are more charming, their mysteries cozier, their noirs more gripping, and their comedies cleverer.

NPR

More clever. Oh, you get it. Acorn TV is brilliant stories told brilliantly. Visit Acorn TV for a 30 day free trial with promo code NPR. So in a nutshell, ACorn TV, brilliant.

PBS

Support for NPR and the following message come from Carvana on a mission to make car buying more convenient and affordable than ever before. In minutes, you can browse thousands of options under $20,000. Visit carvana.com or download the app today to get started. This message comes from NPR sponsor Osea. Their mega moisture duo features two of their clean vegan bestsellers, Ondaria algae body oil and Ondaria collagen body lotion.

Get 10% off your first order with code glowseamalibu.com Dot over the past couple. Decades, the US has lost about a third of its newspapers, taking thousands of local journalists off their beats. A functioning democracy and functioning local journalism go hand in hand. We're trying to do our part, and that's why we need you to do your part. Make sure that the NPR network stays strong by supporting us at donate dot npr.org dot.

NPR

And thank you.

Annemarie Baldonado

I'm FRESH Air's Annemarie Baldonado, here to offer a sneak peek of our latest fresh air plus bonus episode. I think what had always been a barrier to my coming out was the sense that no one would cast me, for example, as Romeo if they knew that in my private life it was Mercutio I fancied rather than Juliet. That's Sir Ian McKellen talking about his decision to come out of the closet in 1988. You can hear how that changed his career for the better by joining fresh air plus yourself at plus dot, npr.org dot. You know, what's interesting about this period is you see everyone wanting to pursue their goals and somehow avoid war.

Dave Davies

I mean, the southerners are going to Washington saying, look, we don't want to fight. We want to live together in peace, let us go our own way. And the Lincoln administration says there's no way we're going to let that happen. But we don't want to tell them that directly because we don't want to confront them because we don't want to start a war. And a similar kind of thing is playing out in the harbor in Charleston where you have this isolated garrison in Fort Sumter.

I mean, they're running low on food and ammunition and soap. And you could try and resupply them. But then would the Confederates, then who built in a lot of new cannons and batteries around harbor, would they fire on the Union troops where they fire on the Union ships? And then would fort Sumter's guns open up on the Confederates? And nobody wanted it to happen.

Nobody wanted to start shooting, and yet everyone wanted to hold their ground. It was really quite a standoff. This is something I really spent time trying to sort of get my head into. It, kind of imagine myself being. There is.

Eric Larsen

Here's Anderson. Here are his 75 soldiers, members of the US Army Corps of Engineers. They are in this fort. They have no instructions coming from Buchanan's administration. Nothing.

Nothing. Nothing. Telling them how to behave, telling them what to do. They are on their own and as they are in this fort, General Beauregard, pupil of Anderson. Pupil.

Anderson, who taught military artillery tactics at. West Point, the southern commander. Right. He is turning Charleston harbor into a death trap for anybody, for anybody within Fort Sumter. He is establishing gun batteries, cannon batteries with seacoast artillery, heavy, heavy artillery on all the land spaces in sort of a broad circle around Fort Sumter.

And if you can imagine this, I mean, Anderson and his men, on certain. On still nights, they could hear the sound of heavy construction at some of these batteries. They could hear these people preparing cannon with every intention of, if necessary, blowing them out of the water, including Beauregard, his friend. He had every intention, if it came to it, to kill him and kill all his men. So here you have all these batteries.

You're hearing this. I mean, it's like being a lamb tied to a stake and you're watching the butcher sharpening his knife on a strop. And this is the situation that confronted Anderson at that time. Yeah. And what's interesting is that throughout all this, you know, this death dealing preparation, there was a code of honor that they used in dealing with each other.

Dave Davies

The Confederates would sometimes send a boat to speak to Major Anderson, the union commander in Fort Sumter, to deal with one issue or another. And I find this remarkable. The Confederates continued to give him mail, mail service. He could write confidential messages to Washington, which would be picked up by the Confederates and then sent to Washington undisturbed, at least until the end. Right.

This is kind of remarkable. Yeah, well, mail was sort of sacrosanct. You know, chivalry. Honor said, you do not open mail. Right.

Eric Larsen

Which was the case until one point in the sag that I found absolutely charming. And that is when things are really starting to devolve and the southerners decide, okay, we're gonna suspend mail, and we're gonna actually take this mail, bring it over to the headquarters, the confederate headquarters of the governor of South Carolina there in Charleston. And they're going to read this mail, and there are three guys there. There is the governor. One guy is Beauregard, and one guy is a former federal judge, and they're sitting there, and nobody wants to open this thing.

And so it first goes to. I believe this is the order. It first goes to the federal judge, and he's like, you know, I spent my career putting people in jail for this, so I can't do it. Then it goes to Beauregard, and he's like, I can't do it. And then it goes to the governor, and he ends up having to open this thing.

And they find lots of really, really terrific intelligence about what's going on at Fort Sumter. Right? So things came to a head at Fort Sumter in mid April when, you know, the troops there at that point were so short of food that they were rationing it. I think they were completely out of soap, and they didn't have candles, so they were operating in the dark at. Night, and they had essentially no food by midair.

Dave Davies

Right. And the union had decided, after a lot of dithering, about, to try and send ships to reinforce them. But they really, for various reasons, couldn't get in there. And if they got in, they would have been fired on by these confederate batteries. And the Confederates learned that, in fact, Lincoln had decided to try and reinforce the garrison.

And they kind of treated this as an act of war and decided they were going to open fire. And they sent the Confederates sent the union commander, Major Anderson, a note saying, at 04:00 a.m.. On, was it April 12, they would open fire. So, again, fair warning, code of honor, but it's coming at you. Right.

Tell us what happened in the bombardment. Lincoln did something that was, I think, politically, was quite brilliant. He decided, okay, he was going to reinforce this fort Sumter, and he understood, I think, at that point, that this was a no win situation, and so try to make it as positive as possible for the union. So what he does is he sends a message to South Carolina's governor, and he says, I'm going to send humanitarian supplies, if you didn't use that term at the time, but I'm going to send humanitarian supplies to the men at Fort Sumter. If they are unmolested, nothing will happen.

Eric Larsen

We will exit the harbor. All will be well. He knew full well that they would be molested. This was too much for the South Carolina forces. The bombardment begins.

And so what Lincoln has gained in this is that the start of the civil war is on the South's conscience. They started it and that was sort of a brilliant tactic. What it ultimately gained, who knows? But that was something he felt very important. So then here comes the day of the bombardment again, chivalry courtesy between Anderson and Beauregard.

It was almost laughable. It's like after you. No, after you. I wish to see you after. This is all over, all this kind of stuff.

When in fact Beauregard plans to kill him. They're sending messages saying, I hold you in the highest regard. We're going to meet again. Oh yeah, oh yeah, yeah, yeah. The closings of these messages back and forth.

And so then comes, okay, this is it. You know, they send a delegation over Anderson. There had been talk that Anderson planned to evacuate the fort. They come over, they ask him his intentions and it turns out that it's not quite that easy from his point of view that he will do so, but he's got various, various qualifications. And that's the point where they send back an ultimatum saying we are going to begin this bombardment at 420 in the morning.

And this is very important because this is like an hour later, right? So 420, this bombardment is to begin. And they're all very cordial and Anderson says goodbye and says, you know, I hope that at some point in some future time we may meet again under better circumstances, whatever. And so 430 rolls around, everybody's attends. There's this scene in Charleston harbor, you know, everybody's wildly partying, you know, this is like the last, the end days, you know.

And so there is the first shot is fired which is actually a signal shot to signal all the batteries to begin firing. So the bombardment begins, this furious bombardment. The confederate forces had a huge advantage over the US army contingent within the fort, you know, which had by now mounted their heavy guns. And that was that the confederate batteries had one target to fire at minute. Sumter had 19 batteries arrayed around the harbor.

Dave Davies

Right? So they were in a bad situation remarkably. I mean, although Fort Sumter took many cannonballs, nobody was killed in the bombardment which went with more than 3000 cannon shots, I believe, but is that right? Yeah, yeah, nobody was killed. Minor injuries which when you imagine how this must of unfolded is just about is miraculous, right?

But mortars that mortar shells did set afire the wooden structures inside the fort which would in the end spread to the powder magazines and created an untenable situation. And so Anderson did essentially have to surrender and did this under terms in which they would be given an honorable departure to union ships and 100 gun salute and the like. But in a way, it was over. I mean, this had been resolved and it had been resolved with war. Yeah.

Eric Larsen

Yeah. So Anderson recognized that he had no choice but to surrender. But again, honor comes to play. Anderson is he's not just going to surrender. He needs to do this in an honorable way.

He insists on being able to, him and his troops being able to salute their flag and with a 100 gun salute and then to march out to a waiting ship. And so the great irony here is that in this quest for honor, the first two deaths of the civil war occur because the salute is being fired, comes to the 47th cannon is fired. There is a misfire, catastrophic misfire. One soldier's arm is blown off. He's killed instantly.

Another is killed. Another actually dies later. And all because of the quest for honor. Yeah, there were accidental deaths. There's a great description in the book of 819 century cannon fire.

Dave Davies

By the way, a lot of wonderful details are in here. So fire has been exchanged between the two sides. Lincoln's reaction is to issue a proclamation. Meaning what? So Lincoln the day after, and I have to believe that he knew that this would be the ultimate outcome of this.

Eric Larsen

Here's this proclamation calling for military forces, volunteer military regiments from all states, including the seceded states. By the way, he was an equal opportunity requester, so he asked for militia forces from all states to prepare for this coming conflict. And that's the thing that finally sends the south finally, I mean, sends the rest of the southern states into the arms of the Confederacy. We'll take another break. Here we are speaking with Eric Larsen.

Dave Davies

His new book is the Demon of Unrest, a saga of hubris, heartbreak and heroism at the dawn of the civil war. We'll continue our conversation in just a moment. This is fresh air in this country. More than two local newspapers are closing down each week as news deserts grow. Public radio is a lifeline for staying informed.

Annemarie Baldonado

Keep that service strong with a donation to the NPR network at donate dot, npr.org dot. And thank you. I'm Myles Parks. I cover voting and election security for NPR. Across the NPR network, we report rigorously on the forces seeking to disrupt democracy and provide communities with reliable information.

Myles Parks

It's public media giving days the perfect time to stand with the facts by donating now at donate dot, npr.org dot. Thank you. There are a lot of issues on voters minds right now. Six big ones could help decide the guns, reproductive rights, immigration, the economy, health care, and the wars overseas. On the consider this podcast from NPR.

NPR

We will unpack the debates on these issues and what's at stake. You can listen to NPR's consider this wherever you get your podcasts. You know, one way of looking at these events is that, you know, America blundered into war because people miscalculated or did dumb things. Another is that war was inevitable. I mean, I know as I read this and you see these two sides trying to achieve their aims without war.

Dave Davies

I mean, Southerners want acceptance without war of succession. The north wants to keep them in the union, but not provoke an armed conflict. And as we read it now, we know that the war was going to come. But I'm wondering, do you think, you know, were there things that could have avoided war? So speculative history is one of the things that I dont do.

Eric Larsen

But having said that, I have to wonder what would have been the outcome if there had been an effectual president in office during that antebellum period instead of James Buchanan. I have to wonder how that could have shaped things. As one character from the moment said, the Times called for Jackson being Andrew Jackson, but Buchanan was no Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson being somebody who, a president who suppressed and earlier, forcefully, not with arms, but with threats, forcefully suppressed a previous rebellious effort by South Carolina, the so called nullification movement, to nullify the act of federal laws within the state of South Carolina. And Jackson moved very assertively against that.

But here's Buchanan, who is allowing this slide, who does nothing, does nothing, at the point of when South Carolina declares secession in December 20, 1860, at a point when there were no artillery batteries surrounding Fort Sumter, when the fort could have been readily reinforced and actually the harbor, very likely the harbor could have been seized by federal forces. Now, that's just me speaking completely, not my territory. But the fact is Buchanan did nothing. In fact, he gives a speech to Congress, very important speech, in which he basically gives up. He basically says, there's nothing I can do.

It is up to Congress. Up to Congress. Right, right, right. Punt. Yeah.

Dave Davies

Yeah. One of the other things that occurred to me that there's a difference between the deep political conflict the nation is experiencing now and that which it experienced in 1860, which is that the, the lines, the issues of division are less clear now. I mean, in 1860, there was this fundamental question, can we keep the institution that commits African Americans to lives of bondage and treating humans as property? Can that continue? And now it's just less clear.

I think there are all kinds of wild theories about this and that, the rich dominating the poor and populism. And some see fascism and some see socialist extremism, but the media environment is so much more diffuse. People hate each other, but I'm not sure that the reasons are as clear as they were in 1860. Yeah. Yeah.

Eric Larsen

You know, a friend of mine, I was kind of moved by it, asked me in an email, he said, well, do you think, do you think there's going to be a civil war? And, you know, I, and I answered, I said, you know, I don't think there's going to be a civil war, at least not in the sense that there was back in 1860, with masses of troops marching over the farmland of Pennsylvania to confront each other at Gettysburg again. But the potential for violence is there. I mean, I was struck by reading a story I believe is in the New York Times about how, how the domestic intelligence apparatus in the United States has grown very concerned about particular subgroup of fringe folk referred to as accelerationists, who want to do things to bring to a head some crisis that would then blow things up and allow the rebuilding of the country or whatever. I don't know what their vision is, but that's something that apparently the FBI and so forth is very concerned about.

So that kind of isolated one on one, you know, Oklahoma courthouse kind of violence could easily happen. I mean, the pressures seemed, seemed to be there. Well, Eric Larsen, thanks so much for speaking with us again. Thank you. Thank you very much.

Dave Davies

Eric Larson's new book about the months preceding the outbreak of the American Civil War is the demon of unrest, a saga of hubris, heartbreak and heroism at the dawn of the civil war. Coming up, David Bianculi reviews the new Hulu series the Veil, starring Elizabeth Moss as a british spy befriending a suspected terrorist. This is fresh air. Every weekday, NPR's best political reporters come to you on the NPR Politics podcast to explain the big news coming out of Washington, the campaign trail and beyond. We don't just want to tell you what happened.

Annemarie Baldonado

We tell you why it mattered matters join the NPR Politics podcast every single. Afternoon to understand the world through political eyes. There's a lot to stay on top of. On any given day, you might have to break things down into smaller pieces in order to keep up. That's why we're introducing the new consider this newsletter from NPR.

Myles Parks

Every weekday we sift through all the day's news and bring you one big story in an easily skimmable format so you become a mini expert on a major topic each day. Sign up for free@npr.org. Consider this newsletter is it possible to. Engineer our way out of the climate crisis? Some entrepreneurs want to shoot particles into the stratosphere to combat global warming.

Annemarie Baldonado

Experts say regulations on this technology aren't keeping up the world of solar geoengineering. On the latest episode of the Sunday story from NPR's up first podcast.

Dave Davies

Elizabeth Moss, who played Peggy in Mad Men and starred in the Handmaid's Tale, stars in a new six part drama series on Hulu. It's called the Veil, and this time she plays a british spy tasked with befriending a suspected female terrorist. The veil is created and written by Stephen Knight from Pinky Blinders and last year's World War Two miniseries all the light we cannot see. Our tv critic David Biancouley has this review. The veil is a spy series about several different spy agencies from the United States, England and France, all after the same goal.

David Biancouley

They want to discover the details of a suspected new 911 type terrorist plot reportedly emanating from the Middle east and stop it before it happens. Sometimes these organizations work together. Sometimes they work against one another. But throughout, the agent who is most crucial to cracking the case is a british super spy temporarily going under the name of Imogen. She's played by Elizabeth Moss of Madmen and the Handmaid's Tale.

And by the end of the six episodes of the Veil, I was convinced that this is her best role and best performance yet. She's amazing as a secret agent. She has plenty of secrets of her own, which unfold slowly as the miniseries progresses. She's a damaged soul with a haunted past, which for her latest mission, turns out to be a valuable asset. She's been charged to locate and befriend a woman who recently surfaced in a refugee camp on the syrian and turkish border.

The woman, going by the name Adela, claims to be of algerian descent and from France, but several spy agencies suspect her of being the elusive mastermind behind the rumored imminent terrorist plot. Imogen's mission is to locate Adela, who is held under guard at the camp after being attacked and stabbed by other refugees. Imogen offers to help Adila escape while getting close enough to try to ascertain her true identity, motives and target. Their first meeting sets the stage for how strong willed both of these women are. Elizabeth Moss, sporting a british accent, is Imogen.

Yum Namarwan from little birds plays Adila. Why would you want to keep me alive? I speak French. Yes, but your accent is very bad. Is it right we have a pledge to keep people alive.

Yum Namarwan

Like doctors. You're not a doctor? No. What are you? Do you need a doctor?

Someone stabbed me in the fight. I didn't notice until after.

You need antibiotics? No. If they give me medicine, it will be poison. No one will poison you. They hate me.

Do you deserve to be hated? The terrorist Imogen is hunting is known as Jin al Raqqa. In folklore, a shapeshifting genie who can assume any form is Adyla. Someone hiding in plain sight by doing precisely that? Or is she as innocent as she claims?

David Biancouley

Imogen, a shapeshifter of sorts herself, uses all her spycraft skills to earn Adila's trust by helping her in her quest to cross borders and return to Paris, where her young daughter awaits. Their journey is fascinating, with each probing to learn the other's secrets while protecting her own. It's a bit like Homeland, where you, the viewer, are unsure of each character's true motives. And as the two women go off the grid and spend time with each other, avoiding all the authorities trying to locate them, their relationship keeps deepening. In that way, the veil is a bit like Thelma and Louise, except sometimes it's more like Thelma versus Louise.

Both characters are delightfully unpredictable, as in this scene from early in episode two. When the two women are on the run, Imogen takes Adila to a smuggler they hope will give them new passports and identities to get to Paris. Imogen's plan is to have them pose as singers and belly dancers. But their proposed cover is at risk when the smuggler decides to test them a little by demanding that Adila display her skills. So you're a dancer, eh?

Eric Larsen

Prove it. She will absolutely not dance for you if you are caught. She'll be asked. You have no right to ask her. The papers say you're a singer and a dancer.

Yum Namarwan

Sing one of your songs. Go on.

David Biancouley

That smuggler was suitably impressed. So was Imogen. And so was I. These two actresses are incredibly nuanced and well matched in these roles, captivating his adversaries and even more so if and when they decide to become allies. The writer and creator of the veil, Stephen Knight, from Peaky Blinders and all the light we cannot see, explores their relationship brilliantly.

But he also keeps escalating the terrorist plot and following the many agents and agencies trying to crack it. One special standout here is Josh Charles from the good wife and sports night, who is cast as an aggressive CIA agent on french soil. An ugly American in Paris, he plays his part perfectly. Even so, the veil. At its core is the story of two shapeshifting survivors who are more alike than either of them suspected and whose realization of that fact may or may not stop a horrifying terrorist attack.

It's quite a voyage and quite a drama. David Biancouley is a professor of television studies at Rowan University. He reviewed the new series the Veil, starring Elizabeth Moss, on tomorrow's show, the Battle over TikTok. Congress and the president say the company must shed its financial ties to China or face a ban in the US. We'll speak with Washington Post tech reporter Drew Harwell about why selling the company is complicated, how TikTok will fight back, and the First Amendment implications of banning the app.

Dave Davies

I hope you can join us to keep up with what's on the show and get highlights of our interviews. Follow us on Instagram. NPrfreshair Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Amy Sallet, Phyllis Myers, Anne Marie Baldonado, Sam Brigger, Lauren Krenzel, Teresa Madden, Thea Challoner, Susan Yakundi and Joel Wolfram.

Our digital media producer is Molly CV Nasper. Roberta Shurock directs the show for Terry Gross. Antonia Moseley, I'm Dave Davies. With more and more information coming at you all day, every day, it can be hard to know where to focus. The new consider this newsletter from NPR can be that focus.

Myles Parks

Every weekday afternoon, we take one of the days biggest stories and break it down in a simple skimmable format so you can get a better grasp of one important topic and what it means for you. In a couple of minutes, sign up for free@npr.org. Consider this newsletter what does it sound. Like to record an album inside a jail? On the documentary podcast track change, you'll hear four men make music inside Richmond City jail and hear how they're trying to break free from a cycle of addiction and incarceration.

Eric Larsen

Been so long since I've been free. Listen to track change from narratively and. VPM, part of the NPR network, on. The Ted Radio hour. In the middle school cafeteria, Ty Teshiro always sat with his equally nerdy buddies.

The socially awkward kids who were the. Furthest thing from cool. And he often wondered, why am I. So socially awkward and what am I going to do about that? Now?

Annemarie Baldonado

Ty is a psychologist and expert on awkwardness, and he has some answers. That's on the Ted radio hour from NPR.

Erik Larson On The Dawn Of The Civil War

Primary Topic

Episode Summary

Main Takeaways

Episode Chapters

1: Introduction to Erik Larson and the Book

2: Deep Dive into South Carolina's Role

3: The Symbolism of Fort Sumter

4: Lincoln's Political Strategy

5: The Outbreak of War

Actionable Advice

About This Episode

People

Companies

Books

Guest Name(s):

Content Warnings:

Transcript